Rich_Rodriguez
You Raise Me Up
They replaced me with Brady Hoke? I think I am going to need therapy after this.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's actually the first intelligent thing I've seen him do. Lester was another ready-made disaster there. Could he operate inside the constraints of scUM recruiting after basically doing what he wanted for a decade in the SEC and B12? How fast would that fanbase turn on him after the first time he couldn't make up his mind on a play with 38 seconds left in the game? Hoke ain't a sexy hire, but at least it appears safe in that regard...and probably comes at a fraction of the cost.OCBucksFan;1855625; said:
LordJeffBuck;1855597; said:Hoke's overall record during his six years at Ball State was 34-38 (.472 winning percentage). His reputation was built during the 2008 season, when Ball State started off 12-0, but then got worked (42-24) by an 8-6 Buffalo team in the MAC title game, and got destroyed (45-13, after Hoke left) by Tulsa in some meaningless bowl game. The 12-0 run looks impressive, but eight of those wins were against the MAC, two wins were against FCS schools (Northeastern and Western Kentucky), and one was against an awful Indiana team that finished with a 3-9 record (this is Hoke's only win to date against an AQ school). The only "quality" win that year was against an 8-5 Navy squad.
Hoke's overall record is 47-50 (.485 winning percentage). However, six of his 47 wins (12.8%) have come against FCS schools (he also has a loss to FCS North Dakota State), and his record against AQ teams is 1-18 (.053 winning percentage). But he is 3-0 versus Navy, including this season's Poinsettia Bowl (his only bowl appearance).
Moreover, Hoke's success in 2008 was based largely on the talents of quareterback Nate Davis, who had Big Ten skills but a MAC academic record. Hoke will not be able to rely on borderline qualifiers at Michigan, especially after RichRod's rather dramatic lowering of the academic standards in Ann Arbor.
I'd say that he's a good-not-great hire long term, but he'll need at least four years to show whether he has the right stuff to return Michigan, if not to prominence, then at least to relevancy. The good news for Michigan Man is that he probably won't embarrass the program like RichRod. The bad news is that he has to get the program to the middle of the Big Ten pack before he can even consider contending for the crown with the likes of Ohio State, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Iowa, and Michigan State. If Michigan Man has lowered expectations, and isn't counting on a quick turn around like Tressel, Meyer, Stoops, Carroll, and Saban were able to achieve, then this might work.
WolverineMike;1855452; said:you basically have everyone that hated RR now on board with Hoke and loving it while at the same time all the RR supporters completely turned off by Hoke and spelling out doomsday for the program.
so essentially, the fan base is exactly where it was.
Absolutely don't mind. Outside perspectives are refreshing.I'll preface this by saying a couple of things:
1. I'd guess our hosts are sick of me relating everything back to Arkansas.
I supported him [RichRod] and defended him until the very end. As I watched the National Championship game between Auburn and Oregon it upset me to realize that Chip Kelly learned the spread from Rich and we had our Michael Dyer (Dee Hart) on the way. We had a coach who was nationally recognized and had a chance at a top ten recruiting class. We were returning a quarterback who in his first year as a starter was the Big Ten offensive player of the year. I had no problem with us making a run at Jim Harbaugh but if Brandon knew he was not interested we should have kept Rich.