• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Big Ten Power Rankings

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Bump to add more rankings;

Thanks to Bucky Katt and NFBuck for being new rankers

Power rankings for week three
IU 148
MS 144
WI 141
OSU 123
Ill 104
Pu 91
MN 76
Ia 58
Ps 39
Mi 35
Nw 21

Contributors were
40
Best
Bmike
BKB
TgFan
LilBuck
BB73
Bucyrus
Junkie
Briegg'
Bernini
Starbucks
bkoch
NFBuck
Bucky katt


Comparison with week 2

IU 139
MSU 125
tOSU 115
Wiscy 110
Ill 89
Pur 83
Iowa 55
Minn 49
PSU 40
Mich 40
NW 19
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Wisc and Minn. both moved up in our rankings over the past week showing good gains with tOSU and Iowa giving way in our voters eyes. A win over NC would move us up a lot I'd bet. :wink2:



All voters please rermember to get your ballots in to 40 either Sunday night or during the day on monday, and thanks for your efforts.
 
Upvote 0
Bernini said:
I had to place the Badgers atop my list (no homer) because I didn't see anywhere possible where I could go with that. Wisconsin was on the ropes at home against a mediocre SEC team in Georgia, but pulled away in the second half, winning by almost 20. I was tempted to return MSU to the top after their impressive loss (if there is such a thing) against UCLA. However, they follow that up with a barnburner against Oakland of Michigan, at home. Indiana loses to an unranked mid major, by 15, on a neutral court. OSU gets embarrassed on a neutral court. There is no elite team in this conference. And the bottom 4 is putrid. The hardest part was assembling the order of: Michigan, Iowa, PSU, and Northwestern. They've all been so putrid, I can't possibly discern one from the other. Purdue and Illinois are the teams of the week, but I had to keep things status quo until they prove more, because I saw a gap in preseason following the top 4. Both have more to prove.
Click to expand...
so in your view right now you see three or four sets of teams and within those groupings they are interchangeable at this point? id agree with that.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeye Nut;1008762; said:
So you're factoring in exhibition games to your power rankings? I hope you're smarter than that.
Click to expand...

And I would hope that you're more knowledgeable about the competitive nature of basketball players, or athletes in general, to acknowledge it should be at least a small factor. Pride should have kicked in at some point, not wanting to be the team who lost to D2 Findlay, whatever the circumstance. It would be different if the current squad was largely proven.....but they're not. It's a small factor for me with limited evidence certainly. By game 10 or so it will probably be thrown out the window.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
MaxBuck;1007811; said:
We were exposed, big time. Lots more development needed on this team. The potential is certainly there, though, to be a really good team later in the season.
Click to expand...

And we looked very good against Syracuse. Going to NYC and winning that game in the way we did was very impressive, IMO. Certainly more impressive than anything Wisconsin's done thus far.
 
Upvote 0
jimotis4heisman;1008807; said:
so in your view right now you see three or four sets of teams and within those groupings they are interchangeable at this point? id agree with that.
Click to expand...

I think that's a pretty accurate interpretation.

tier 1 (UW, OSU, MSU, and IU)
tier 2 (UI, PU)
tier 3 (Minny, UM)
tier 4 (PSU, NW, and IA)

The tiers are fixed but the orders within those tiers are interchangeable, IMO.
 
Upvote 0
Bernini;1008813; said:
And I would hope that you're more knowledgeable about the competitive nature of basketball players, or athletes in general, to acknowledge it should be at least a small factor. Pride should have kicked in at some point, not wanting to be the team who lost to D2 Findlay, whatever the circumstance. It would be different if the current squad was largely proven.....but they're not. It's a small factor for me with limited evidence certainly. By game 10 or so it will probably be thrown out the window.
Click to expand...
I understand the competitive nature of players. I also understand that it was an exhibition game and they treated it as such for the majority of the game, they didn't start to compete until the final minutes. So basically you're judging them on how well they can turn on the switch, which will never happen in a regular season game because they won't be treating any of those games like exhibition games for the first 35 minutes. Michigan State lost to a D2 team too and two weeks later outplayed #1 UCLA, unfortunately losing the lead in the final minute. I took nothing from their loss and still think they're going to win the league. If a team isn't taking a game seriously for the majority of the game I don't see how anything can be taken from it.
 
Upvote 0
Hey guys Just a reminder, try to get your rankings in as early as possible today (This evening)
Thanks and have fun. after you have sent them how about adding a post describing the changes you have made , for discussion purposes.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top