• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Jump to latest Follow Reply

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%

  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%

  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%

  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%

  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%

  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%

  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%

  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%

  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%

  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%

  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%

  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%

  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%

  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%

  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%

  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%

  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%

  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%

  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%

  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%
  • Total voters
    313
Sort by date Sort by votes
nw.gif
 
Upvote 0
I still have not fully grasped what it means for USC and UCLA to join the B1G.
Is it temporary? Im not fully believing this lasts more than ~10 years before they go back to recreate a new PAC.
But i guess it's good money for everyone (not left behind) in the meantime.

Not a big fan of leaving our newfound B1G East conference either... it's been nice for the past 10ish years. Leaving all those shitty West schools to their own devices so we could go East Coast.

Hilarious that once Austin left bxii, CU went back to start over. Could we do a 3-conference trade with Corn, acquiring Seattle, Nike, and ASU?
 
Upvote 0
kujirakira said:
I still have not fully grasped what it means for USC and UCLA to join the B1G.
Is it temporary? Im not fully believing this lasts more than ~10 years before they go back to recreate a new PAC.
But i guess it's good money for everyone (not left behind) in the meantime.

Not a big fan of leaving our newfound B1G East conference either... it's been nice for the past 10ish years. Leaving all those shitty West schools to their own devices so we could go East Coast.

Hilarious that once Austin left bxii, CU went back to start over. Could we do a 3-conference trade with Corn, acquiring Seattle, Nike, and ASU?
Click to expand...
They might try after a while to reconstitute the pac-8 or 10. So long as they can get the big names back, lose the smaller schools, and maybe snatch ND. But it will come down to the money. Big ten is going to be dishing out 75M a year to each school in media rights alone. Probably similar to the ND as a Indy they wouldn’t need to make it all up, but would need to get close to it.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top