Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not sure there would be anything super about that third conference....and Stanford won't join (or allow a team in) any conference with "religious" affiliation. Pretty sure Berkeley won't either ($ changes a lot but those two could easily settle for a whatever is left west coast league).Just sayin': I can actually see three 20 team so called "super conferences". The B1G & SEC takes who they want from the ACC and PAC-12 to get to 20, and the BIG 12 picks over what is left to full up their conference. I really think that the BIG 12 screwed up royally by by prematurely adding BYU, UCF, Cincinnati and Houston; I wonder if it is too late for the BIG 12 to negate that deal......
I can remember when the real goal was to get to the “Granddaddy” and play USC or UCLA, and that was what mattered to most people…now it’s a conference game. I just can’t…
I love Ohio State. I will always love and root for Ohio State. But I hate these super conferences. Hate them.
I think 2006 was the beginning of the downfall of college football. The conference wars kicked into high gear after that and espn decided to side with the sec. It's hasn't been remotely the same since.
Not sure there would be anything super about that third conference....and Stanford won't join (or allow a team in) any conference with "religious" affiliation. Pretty sure Berkeley won't either ($ changes a lot but those two could easily settle for a whatever is left west coast league).
Sleeping with someone is different than marrying them, no?Then why do they play Notre Dame every year?
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/30/sport/usc-ucla-big-ten-spt/index.htmlIn its statement, the Pac-12 said it will "continue to thrive" despite the departure of the two colleges.
"We've long been known as the Conference of Champions, and we're unwavering in our commitment to extend that title," the Pac-12 Conference said in a statement. "We will continue to develop new and innovative programs that directly benefit our member institutions, and we look forward to partnering with current and potential members to pioneer the future of college athletics together."
Opinions on Kevin Warren now?
Building the TV network and adding Penn St will always be feathers in Jim Delaneys cap, but nabbing USC and UCLA seems a helluva more seismic shift in the broadcasting landscape than bagging Nebraska, Maryland, and Rutgers — none of which appeared to be wanted by the conferences they were actually already members of short of their buyout money and penalties.
Yeah he's great at keeping a lid on things if anything else. We'll get more of the story eventually so we'll know about thatDepends if he really did much more than say "Yes, let me go through the formality of calling the presidents for a vote." From the sounds of things, this was initiated by the two schools, so I'll give him that he was smart enough to not say no right away in that sense. Keeping it all quiet (because there's no way the conversation started just this morning) is something big I'd give him credit for, though, and I consider that no small factor here considering the implications it will have immediately and over the next two years. His real measuring stick is what happens from here, in my IMO. Does he actually have UW and maybe Oregon lined up waiting for another formal gesture once the dominos start to fall? Who are the other teams he's considering?