• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Big Ten and other Conference Expansion

Which Teams Should the Big Ten Add? (please limit to four selections)

  • Boston College

    Votes: 32 10.2%
  • Cincinnati

    Votes: 19 6.1%
  • Connecticut

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • Duke

    Votes: 21 6.7%
  • Georgia Tech

    Votes: 55 17.6%
  • Kansas

    Votes: 46 14.7%
  • Maryland

    Votes: 67 21.4%
  • Missouri

    Votes: 90 28.8%
  • North Carolina

    Votes: 39 12.5%
  • Notre Dame

    Votes: 209 66.8%
  • Oklahoma

    Votes: 78 24.9%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 45 14.4%
  • Rutgers

    Votes: 40 12.8%
  • Syracuse

    Votes: 18 5.8%
  • Texas

    Votes: 121 38.7%
  • Vanderbilt

    Votes: 15 4.8%
  • Virginia

    Votes: 47 15.0%
  • Virginia Tech

    Votes: 62 19.8%
  • Stay at 12 teams and don't expand

    Votes: 27 8.6%
  • Add some other school(s) not listed

    Votes: 25 8.0%

  • Total voters
    313
Interesting. I always figured the Ed O'Bannon decision paved the way.

It did. O’Bannon v NCAA stopped the NCAA from profiting off the NIL of current and former athletes. NCAA v Alston established that athletes are allowed to profit off the NIL of themselves; that making money off ones own popularity does not affect amateurism status or make a person a professional.

The case was a direct extension of the decision of the first, but they addressed two different issues. Alston essentially tested Jeremy Bloom’s arguments from 2005/06, with the precedent of O’Bannon giving it firmer legal standing to go forward than Bloom had previously.
 
Upvote 0
To McMurphy and ESECPN (not to you Woof)

suck-it-tripled-h.gif
The real enemy of the Alliance is the Big XII. They are seriously pissed, simultaneously with ridiculing the Alliance.

Now, I'm not necessarily saying that the ridiculing is misplaced ...
 
Upvote 0
The alliance isn't about scheduling, nil, or anything else. The alliance is 3 conferences signaling that they have a voting bloc. That's it. There's nothing else to see here.
Well they made a big deal about scheduling in the announcement. But yeah other than a lose agreement to schedule each other in the future. It's real purpose is to not let the SEC dictate terms about the playoff. The nature of athletics etc
 
Upvote 0
Tuesday: Alliance publicly announced
Wednesday: Immediate legal warning from the Alston attorneys



This is an easy fix… stand up a shell organization that strikes NIL deals for players in the ‘alliance’ conferences buying medial across the states participating in the Conference of Northern Aggression. That way there is no ‘alliance’ per se… and schools outside of the footprint would have minimal gain were they to be represented.

Fuck the SEC, fuck what remains of the B12, fuck the schools from the B12 that want in the B1G and Fuck ESPN.

Can we get a Sherman and Grant images added to the smilies tab? Thanks in advance.
 
Upvote 0
Well they made a big deal about scheduling in the announcement. But yeah other than a lose agreement to schedule each other in the future. It's real purpose is to not let the SEC dictate terms about the playoff. The nature of athletics etc

I really like this post

I mean, sure, I agree with it and all

But the main reason is, after seeing the word “loose” typed when someone meant “lose” exactly 735,243 times on this board, I have now finally seen someone type “lose” when they meant “loose”.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top