sepia5;1984988; said:
I don't know why Delany would be tryiing to cause the SEC fret in that manner. It's not as if Notre Dame or Texas would ever consider going to the SEC. The Pac 10 may be concerned, though.
Good point, the only thing I can think of is that Delany knows the Big 10 presidents don't want to expand any further, at least not this quickly. Maybe 5-10 years down the road, but they want to see how a 12 team conference goes.
Texas of course really prefers the Big 12 -2 to stay together. They run the conference and with the Longhorn Network will be maximizing their revenues. They don't want to give that up to go to the Pac12/14/16, they can't pull off Independence due to non-football sports and while they like the B1G, that is there place of last resort.
Of course Notre Dame wants to hold off Independence as long as possible. So they want the status quo.
SOOOOOO, if Texas, Notre Dame and the B1G have the same interests... ie Keep things the way they are for a little longer, than I can see how they could work together on this. Using that logic, you would want to scare the SEC from taking A&M, or if they take A&M it causes the fewest ripples (West Virginia to SEC, and the Big 12-2-1 stays together keeping the Pac12 from taking Oklahoma/Okie St)
How likely is all of that? Who knows, but I was trying to think of a reason they all might be working together on this. And who knows, Delany might be willing to go along with this because IF all heck breaks loose Texas & Notre Dame will come to the B1G.