HailToMichigan
Maize and Blue Wahoo
Entirely up to the preference of whether you think the humans or the computers are more reliable, I think. Like I said, the only difference between the calculation of the human polls and the computer poll is the removal of the top and bottom computer. And IMO, the way they calculate the computer poll is fine. There are 60 coaches and almost twice that many Harris voters, but only six computers, so reducing the ability of one computer to drastically affect the outcome of the standings seems reasonable. If there were 60 computers and only six humans, you'd want to do it with the human vote instead.Zurp;961324; said:Good point. But for consistency, shouldn't the average of each of the individual computer voters be calculated the same way as the average of the human voters?
Upvote
0