Sloopy45
Pimp Minister Sinister
BuckeyeBill: "The fallacy with that argument is that the money is there regardless of whether its Oregon or Ohio State."
Yes, there will be a huge amount of money involved, be it Oregon or OSU. But no business exec in the world is going to say, "Oh, we'd make a million dollars anyway, there's no need to get greedy and make 2 million dollars with Ohio State." There is potentially a lot more money to be made with the Buckeyes than with the Ducks. You're overlooking that completely.
"Television will still get a great draw, and the game will almost certainly be a sell-out."
What about the million more Ohioas than Oregonians that will travel to Tempe, stay in the local hotels, and spend money around the city (even if they don't go to the game)? Tourism is a huge factor, and the biggest reason why these Bowls exist in the first place.
What about the increased advertising dollars to the network in anticipation of a higher rating?
Yes, there will be a huge amount of money involved, be it Oregon or OSU. But no business exec in the world is going to say, "Oh, we'd make a million dollars anyway, there's no need to get greedy and make 2 million dollars with Ohio State." There is potentially a lot more money to be made with the Buckeyes than with the Ducks. You're overlooking that completely.
"Television will still get a great draw, and the game will almost certainly be a sell-out."
What about the million more Ohioas than Oregonians that will travel to Tempe, stay in the local hotels, and spend money around the city (even if they don't go to the game)? Tourism is a huge factor, and the biggest reason why these Bowls exist in the first place.
What about the increased advertising dollars to the network in anticipation of a higher rating?
Upvote
0