Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
TBN is seen 5 Million homes per week, the 700 Club has a regular daily audience of 1 Million.DubCoffman62;1644895; said:Does anyone really take him seriously anymore?
DubCoffman62;1644895; said:Does anyone really take him seriously anymore?
I'd hardly say that those who discredit Pat Robertson by and large have any interest in discrediting religion. His brand of "religion," sure. But many of us who are faithful Christians find Robertson's teachings often to be execrable.buckeyegrad;1647351; said:He appears to be taken very seriously by anyone seeking to discredit religion.
Religion should not be discredited because Pat is a nut-job, but that is the sad fallout. Since his persona is "Religious guy", his failings have a fallout on anyone who is looking at religion with a "should I participate in this?" mindset.buckeyegrad;1647351; said:He appears to be taken very seriously by anyone seeking to discredit religion.
MaxBuck;1647577; said:I'd hardly say that those who discredit Pat Robertson by and large have any interest in discrediting religion. His brand of "religion," sure. But many of us who are faithful Christians find Robertson's teachings often to be execrable.
Fair enough, and you and I don't disagree on this one. One could paraphrase you (I believe) that those who are trying to discredit religion find Robertson to be an attractive target, and I agree. I was trying to say that there is plenty of reason for people of faith to criticize Robertson; you kind of proved my point, having done so yourself. :)buckeyegrad;1649104; said:I wasn't talking about those who seek to discredit Robertson (I'm one of them considering I gave a sermon this weekend at my congregation showing how what he said doesn't line up with Scripture); I was referring to those who seek to elevate him as those he is still the most prominent "religious" person in the United States--a position he hasn't been anywhere close to for a good 15 years IMO.
But Robertson shares the same values and beliefs as a large percentage of the population even though he may not be their religious leader (beliefs such as natural disasters are caused by God, that we are a Christian nation and those beliefs should permeate government and public schools, etc.). And that's what makes him Bat-Poop Crazy.buckeyegrad;1649104; said:I wasn't talking about those who seek to discredit Robertson (I'm one of them considering I gave a sermon this weekend at my congregation showing how what he said doesn't line up with Scripture); I was referring to those who seek to elevate him as those he is still the most prominent "religious" person in the United States--a position he hasn't been anywhere close to for a good 15 years IMO.
Brewtus;1649851; said:But Robertson shares the same values and beliefs as a large percentage of the population even though he may not be their religious leader (beliefs such as natural disasters are caused by God, that we are a Christian nation and those beliefs should permeate government and public schools, etc.). And that's what makes him Bat-Poop Crazy.
BuckeyeMike80;1650233; said:Maybe I'm missing something here, but I don't see anyone saying that Robertson isn't nuts.
What your statement seems to imply is you think everyone who is religious is "bat-poop" crazy.
Brewtus;1650398; said:The term "religious" covers a broad spectrum of beliefs, but yep - in general I think most religious people are Bat-Poop Crazy.