2026 scUM Shenanigans, Arguments, Arrogant Twatwaffles, Emasculated Cucks, Feckless Marmots, Dirty Cheaters "Mid"chigan

[pnuts34]

Anybody who studies Whittingham's past teams know he runs a more Urban type offense.

I don't defend Scum, but sometimes you have to call it bs when it reads like bs or overblown.

And honestly, Bryce is their best option at QB for that offense. Whitt like Urban love their QBs to run and be used as extra offensive weapons. Tommy Carr is not the type of QB that is good for a Whitt offense, that kid is a spread air it out type of QB. Utah was #2 in team rushing last year, and their QB was the 2nd leading rusher. That fits Underwood more than Carr. But I know disgruntled fans will always want the backup to play and won't pay attention to scheme. You have a terribly inaccurate, immature, high paid QB who has nothing more than elite athleticism, and his backup is a pro style, spread gunslinger. And the offense is setup as a heavy RPO style which is set up for Underwood, but he's just not very good

 

[1926Buckeyes]

And honestly, Bryce is their best option at QB for that offense. Whitt like Urban love their QBs to run and be used as extra offensive weapons. Tommy Carr is not the type of QB that is good for a Whitt offense, that kid is a spread air it out type of QB. Utah was #2 in team rushing last year, and their QB was the 2nd leading rusher. That fits Underwood more than Carr. But I know disgruntled fans will always want the backup to play and won't pay attention to scheme. You have a terribly inaccurate, immature, high paid QB who has nothing more than elite athleticism, and his backup is a pro style, spread gunslinger. And the offense is setup as a heavy RPO style which is set up for Underwood, but he's just not very good

I’m not sure I’d say he’s an elite athlete, or even that Urban’s offense would suit him. Don’t get me wrong, he’s big and straight-line fast, but doesn’t have the quickness or lateral speed to be a primary runner. JTB wasn’t an elite athlete, but was more compact and had the mindset and vision of an RB when running.

His best runs come on draw plays or roll outs where the defense isn’t expecting him to rush and he can build speed before cutting. Reminds me of a smaller, faster Justin Herbert (as a runner).

 

[Jaxbuck]

The problem for them is that Urban's offense stopped working against good teams about 10 years ago.

It's why he brought in Day.

 

[OREGONSOCKPUPPET]

The problem for them is that Urban's offense stopped working against good teams about 10 years ago.

It's why he brought in Day.

That is what separates the great coaches. They adapt and are more proactive than reactive. We saw it with Saban. You could say Julio Jones was even underutilized at Bama, but Bama started bringing in top receiver recruits and opened it up a bit going away from a smashmouth type of offense where he loved to run the ball. They still ran the ball, but they had a guy like Davonta Smith who could terrorize defenses that he may not have done in the past. That is another problem for Michigan. They are living in the 1900s and not adapting to the current game. Thank their shitty leadership.

 

[buckeyemania11]

And honestly, Bryce is their best option at QB for that offense. Whitt like Urban love their QBs to run and be used as extra offensive weapons. Tommy Carr is not the type of QB that is good for a Whitt offense, that kid is a spread air it out type of QB. Utah was #2 in team rushing last year, and their QB was the 2nd leading rusher. That fits Underwood more than Carr. But I know disgruntled fans will always want the backup to play and won't pay attention to scheme. You have a terribly inaccurate, immature, high paid QB who has nothing more than elite athleticism, and his backup is a pro style, spread gunslinger. And the offense is setup as a heavy RPO style which is set up for Underwood, but he's just not very good

The problem is that Bryce does not have the intangibles required to be a good running QB in college. He's got good enough athleticism but his vision and ability to make reads are terrible. His actual running ability has always been overblown.

 

[buckeyemania11]

I appreciate how the Harvard of the West geniuses immediately blame the coaching staff without a flicker of thought towards the impact a checked out diva at QB has on not only the effectiveness of the called plays, but the ability to even fully open up the playbook they were promised in the first place.

You gotta remember the blind arrogance of his teammates. They probably are pissed that Whittingham dare question the ability of their quarterback who people around the program have ever only hyped up as a player the likes we have never seen before.

 

[pnuts34]

I’m not sure I’d say he’s an elite athlete, or even that Urban’s offense would suit him. Don’t get me wrong, he’s big and straight-line fast, but doesn’t have the quickness or lateral speed to be a primary runner. JTB wasn’t an elite athlete, but was more compact and had the mindset and vision of an RB when running.

His best runs come on draw plays or roll outs where the defense isn’t expecting him to rush and he can build speed before cutting. Reminds me of a smaller, faster Justin Herbert (as a runner).

He's as athletic(if not more) as Devon Dampier who was the Utah QB last year. I'm just saying that the offense that Beck likes to run is predicated on an athletic running QB, which Underwood is. And they can't make it work. He doesn't read defenses well either, which doesn't help RPO, but I agree, his best runs are from draws and broken plays

That's why it was so baffling seeing Jaime Ffrench leave Tejas for scUM, he's in an offense that only throws to the TE and maybe 1 primary WR. Buchanon is going to be the go to, and Marsh and Ffrench will not be happy

 

[Captain Buckeye]

Need to have the players to be explosive.

Still their best offensive perimeter weapon is a TE.

 

[BB73]

12-7.................NEVER FORGET!!!!

I think we here at BP share some blame here.

We have mentioned so many times that a team only kicking Field Goals can’t beat a team that has scored a TD that the B1G refs made it so.

 

[buckeyemania11]

He's as athletic(if not more) as Devon Dampier who was the Utah QB last year. I'm just saying that the offense that Beck likes to run is predicated on an athletic running QB, which Underwood is. And they can't make it work. He doesn't read defenses well either, which doesn't help RPO, but I agree, his best runs are from draws and broken plays

That's why it was so baffling seeing Jaime Ffrench leave Tejas for scUM, he's in an offense that only throws to the TE and maybe 1 primary WR. Buchanon is going to be the go to, and Marsh and Ffrench will not be happy

The book is already out on Underwood. We saw the better Ds easily corral him last year and it's only going to get worse for him because he has not improved at all in any area.

Dampier has way better vision and is much better at those read type plays. You aren't replicating what you did with Dampier with Underwood. I think Whittingham and Co already recognize that even trying would probably turn into disaster, that's why you see the safer play calling that's getting complained about. They know they have a QB who can't make reads and is wildly inaccurate throwing the ball so of course they aren't going to call a bunch of higher risk type plays and get themselves behind the chains constantly. They gave him that chance at the end of the 1st half against WMU and he burnt them by throwing a completely awful INT that allowed WMU to score before half. Their best chance at winning is hoping the OL can get it together and the usual scUM ground and pound type attack starts working better along with the defense hanging on and keeping it close enough to give them a chance.

Ffrench going to scUM is of no shock. He's always been a bag chaser. He doesn't care that he's like the 7th option on a run heavy team as long as the check clears.

 

[gmen6981]

That is what separates the great coaches. They adapt and are more proactive than reactive. We saw it with Saban. You could say Julio Jones was even underutilized at Bama, but Bama started bringing in top receiver recruits and opened it up a bit going away from a smashmouth type of offense where he loved to run the ball. They still ran the ball, but they had a guy like Davonta Smith who could terrorize defenses that he may not have done in the past. That is another problem for Michigan. They are living in the 1900s and not adapting to the current game. Thank their shitty leadership.

Yep. I can remember Saban bitching about hurry up spread offenses saying they were dangerous for defensive players because they didn't have time to get set. And yet he shifted towards just that because that's what it took to win.

 

[TwinsBuck]

I think we here at BP share some blame here.

We have mentioned so many times that a team only kicking Field Goals can’t beat a team that has scored a TD that the B1G refs made it so.

But even with BIG's official statement, the game was probably over because college football has no partial seconds. So they said the clock showed 0:01 when the WMU player touched the ball. If he did not touch it at the precise moment it went from 0:02 to 0:01, then there was only a partial second, which by rule has to be allowed to go to 0:00 even if it was 90% of that second remaining. For another play to be awarded with 0:01 remaining, he would had to touch it with 0:02 showing on the clock and it about to go to 0:01 because an entire second would required. But once they saw it at 0:01, even if it was showing ever so briefly, it would not have been a full second. Therefore, by rule, game over.

 

[OREGONSOCKPUPPET]

But even with BIG's official statement, the game was probably over because college football has no partial seconds. So they said the clock showed 0:01 when the WMU player touched the ball. If he did not touch it at the precise moment it went from 0:02 to 0:01, then there was only a partial second, which by rule has to be allowed to go to 0:00 even if it was 90% of that second remaining. For another play to be awarded with 0:01 remaining, he would had to touch it with 0:02 showing on the clock and it about to go to 0:01 because an entire second would required. But once they saw it at 0:01, even if it was showing ever so briefly, it would not have been a full second. Therefore, by rule, game over.

There was 00:00:0001 seconds left.

Some Michigan retard, probably.

 

[buckeyemania11]

But even with BIG's official statement, the game was probably over because college football has no partial seconds. So they said the clock showed 0:01 when the WMU player touched the ball. If he did not touch it at the precise moment it went from 0:02 to 0:01, then there was only a partial second, which by rule has to be allowed to go to 0:00 even if it was 90% of that second remaining. For another play to be awarded with 0:01 remaining, he would had to touch it with 0:02 showing on the clock and it about to go to 0:01 because an entire second would required. But once they saw it at 0:01, even if it was showing ever so briefly, it would not have been a full second. Therefore, by rule, game over.

The B1Gs official statement was a fucking joke and most people recognize that.

 

[osuvictory1]