CincyInterloper
Hall of Fame
If the objective is to incentivize universities to schedule interesting games, then playoff rankings should be based on ratings. It’s as simple as that.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
you realize that's the current system, and 2 different teams are lamenting having scheduled those interesting games.....If the objective is to incentivize universities to schedule interesting games, then playoff rankings should be based on ratings. It’s as simple as that.
Texas would be the third team in based on ratings. https://www.on3.com/news/college-football-tv-ratings-tracking-top-10-most-watched-teams-2025-season/you realize that's the current system, and 2 different teams are lamenting having scheduled those interesting games.....
You're not wrong, but I know that Akron, Kent State, and Toledo are never going to be a threat to a Buckeye team that deserves to be in the playoffs. Schedule teams like that and lose 2 or fewer games every year. Or, in the case of Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois, you better not lose any more games after that.you can't schedule knowing how good a team will be, or will not be, that year.
Meh. No one wants to watch a game that doesn't matter. I mean, I'll still watch the Buckeye games. But who's watching Alabama vs. Clemson if neither team is helped or hurt by the result?My solution is just 12 10-team conferences. Play 9 conference games every season, winner take all. Play 3 OOC "warm up games" like the NFL for seeding and ticket selling purposes. You could schedule all marquee games that way, since they won't "matter".
You're not wrong, but I know that Akron, Kent State, and Toledo are never going to be a threat to a Buckeye team that deserves to be in the playoffs. Schedule teams like that and lose 2 or fewer games every year. Or, in the case of Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois, you better not lose any more games after that.
Meh. No one wants to watch a game that doesn't matter. I mean, I'll still watch the Buckeye games. But who's watching Alabama vs. Clemson if neither team is helped or hurt by the result?
You have a fair point and I don't have an answer. You think you're going to be all awesome by scheduling a team that lost in the semifinals last year: Penn State. You shouldn't be "punished" because your "strong" team finished 6-6.My main point is that whatever an opponent does after you play them is out of your control and should have zero impact on your season from there.
What if their QB gets hurt, or a scum bag coach leaves in the middle of the night and takes his staff with him? Anything can happen after you beat a team, why would you possibly want to open the door for any of that to punish you? I am all for scheduling changes but that is not anything I ever want to see get implemented.
An update after the late games on Saturday.
8 teams are locked in.
tOSU and Indiana, winner obviously the #1 seed
Oregon, Ole Miss, aTm, and Oklahoma, all done playing
UGA and Texas Tech, both in top-4 now and are in even if they lose their CCG
2 more spots have to go to the the highest ranked winners of these 3 CCGs: ACC (UVA/Duke), AAC (N. Texas at Tulane), and Sun Belt (Troy at James Madison). So if Duke and James Madison both win, the ACC will likely get ZERO teams in.
That’s 10 spots, leaving 2 spots for these teams:
Bama - beat UGA in the CCG and it’s an auto-bid. Lose and it’s a debate/beauty/brand name contest
BYU - beat Texas Tech in the CCG and it’s an auto-bid and the Big-12 gets 2 teams. Lose and they’ll get dumped for losing the extra game, which is the same reason that Bama won’t be dumped
ND - I think they need a BYU loss, else their fans will scream about the lower ranked CCG winners getting it (you hate to see it)
Miami - they need BYU to lose and the head-to-head argument with ND to be a key factor
Vandy and Texas won‘t be in the top-10 and won’t have a chance.
I‘m rooting big-time for Duke, BYU, and James Madison so the ACC/ND semi-marriage gets completely left out.
An update after the late games on Saturday.
8 teams are locked in.
tOSU and Indiana, winner obviously the #1 seed
Oregon, Ole Miss, aTm, and Oklahoma, all done playing
UGA and Texas Tech, both in top-4 now and are in even if they lose their CCG
2 more spots have to go to the the highest ranked winners of these 3 CCGs: ACC (UVA/Duke), AAC (N. Texas at Tulane), and Sun Belt (Troy at James Madison). So if Duke and James Madison both win, the ACC will likely get ZERO teams in.
That’s 10 spots, leaving 2 spots for these teams:
Bama - beat UGA in the CCG and it’s an auto-bid. Lose and it’s a debate/beauty/brand name contest
BYU - beat Texas Tech in the CCG and it’s an auto-bid and the Big-12 gets 2 teams. Lose and they’ll get dumped for losing the extra game, which is the same reason that Bama won’t be dumped
ND - I think they need a BYU loss, else their fans will scream about the lower ranked CCG winners getting it (you hate to see it)
Miami - they need BYU to lose and the head-to-head argument with ND to be a key factor
Vandy and Texas won‘t be in the top-10 and won’t have a chance.
I‘m rooting big-time for Duke, BYU, and James Madison so the ACC/ND semi-marriage gets completely left out.