• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025 College Football Playoffs Discussion (12 Team Format)

you can't schedule knowing how good a team will be, or will not be, that year.
You're not wrong, but I know that Akron, Kent State, and Toledo are never going to be a threat to a Buckeye team that deserves to be in the playoffs. Schedule teams like that and lose 2 or fewer games every year. Or, in the case of Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois, you better not lose any more games after that.

My solution is just 12 10-team conferences. Play 9 conference games every season, winner take all. Play 3 OOC "warm up games" like the NFL for seeding and ticket selling purposes. You could schedule all marquee games that way, since they won't "matter".
Meh. No one wants to watch a game that doesn't matter. I mean, I'll still watch the Buckeye games. But who's watching Alabama vs. Clemson if neither team is helped or hurt by the result?
 
Upvote 0
You're not wrong, but I know that Akron, Kent State, and Toledo are never going to be a threat to a Buckeye team that deserves to be in the playoffs. Schedule teams like that and lose 2 or fewer games every year. Or, in the case of Notre Dame losing to Northern Illinois, you better not lose any more games after that.


Meh. No one wants to watch a game that doesn't matter. I mean, I'll still watch the Buckeye games. But who's watching Alabama vs. Clemson if neither team is helped or hurt by the result?

My main point is that whatever an opponent does after you play them is out of your control and should have zero impact on your season from there.

What if their QB gets hurt, or a scum bag coach leaves in the middle of the night and takes his staff with him? Anything can happen after you beat a team, why would you possibly want to open the door for any of that to punish you? I am all for scheduling changes but that is not anything I ever want to see get implemented.
 
Upvote 0
My main point is that whatever an opponent does after you play them is out of your control and should have zero impact on your season from there.

What if their QB gets hurt, or a scum bag coach leaves in the middle of the night and takes his staff with him? Anything can happen after you beat a team, why would you possibly want to open the door for any of that to punish you? I am all for scheduling changes but that is not anything I ever want to see get implemented.
You have a fair point and I don't have an answer. You think you're going to be all awesome by scheduling a team that lost in the semifinals last year: Penn State. You shouldn't be "punished" because your "strong" team finished 6-6.
So, how do you incentivize a team to schedule Texas, or Georgia, or I mean, name anyone here. I know a lot of the SEC teams get criticized for scheduling too many shlubs. Should that continue? Maybe the answer is "yes - let everyone schedule whoever they want for OOC." If that's the case, then fine. But if Texas thinks they should schedule only shlubs to minimize the chances of losing, then they're going to schedule only shlubs.

I'm sure I'm worried about this more than I should be. But I'd like to see more of these big OOC matchups.

End communication.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top