• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

2023 tCun Shenanigans, Arguments, Cobras, Feckless Marmots, Fake Pandas, Dirty Cheaters

Status
Not open for further replies.


I believe step 1 is the gathering of facts.

step2_1.png


step3_1.png


step4.png


Once the investigation has closed, the NCAA enforcement staff sends a notice of allegations to an institution and involved individuals. The notice of allegations outlines the rules that the institution is alleged to have broken and describes the facts of the case.

However, if an institution agrees with the facts that the investigation has uncovered, the case can enter the summary-disposition process before a notice of allegations is provided. In summary disposition, the school and the enforcement staff agree on the facts and a set of penalties to be imposed; no hearing before the Committee on Infractions is necessary.

Once an institution receives a notice of allegations, it has up to 90 days to respond in writing. Extensions can be provided. Evidence − including recorded interviews, summaries and transcripts − can be reviewed at the national office or through a private, secure website.

When all parties have had the opportunity to respond, a hearing is set before the Committee on Infractions.

Just sayin': Once scUM gets the NCAA's official notice of allegations (which they haven't even received yet) they have 90 days to respond. You know that they they won't agree and they will use the full 90 days too. I'll say it will take several months longer than Buckeye Scoop's March/April estimate for the hammer to drop..
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0


I believe step 1 is the gathering of facts.

step2_1.png


step3_1.png


step4.png


Once the investigation has closed, the NCAA enforcement staff sends a notice of allegations to an institution and involved individuals. The notice of allegations outlines the rules that the institution is alleged to have broken and describes the facts of the case.

However, if an institution agrees with the facts that the investigation has uncovered, the case can enter the summary-disposition process before a notice of allegations is provided. In summary disposition, the school and the enforcement staff agree on the facts and a set of penalties to be imposed; no hearing before the Committee on Infractions is necessary.

Once an institution receives a notice of allegations, it has up to 90 days to respond in writing. Extensions can be provided. Evidence − including recorded interviews, summaries and transcripts − can be reviewed at the national office or through a private, secure website.

When all parties have had the opportunity to respond, a hearing is set before the Committee on Infractions.

Just sayin': Once scUm gets the NCAA's official notice of allegations (which they haven't even received yet) they have 90 days to respond. You know that they they won't agree and they will use the full 90 days too. I'll say it will take several months longer than Buckeye Scoop's March/April estimate for the hammer to drop..

I hate scUM with the heat of 1,000 suns, but NevadaBuck is a fucking idiot.
 
Upvote 0
Ono's made it clear that his response will be to deny, deflect, claim victimhood and protect the coaches at all costs.

Which just doesn’t add up. He is a political creature and in his given environment an apex predator. You would think his instincts are better than that.

Either the NCAA stuff isn’t as bad as it’s been made out to be or he’s completely misreading the situation.
 
Upvote 0
Which just doesn’t add up. He is a political creature and in his given environment an apex predator. You would think his instincts are better than that.

Either the NCAA stuff isn’t as bad as it’s been made out to be or he’s completely misreading the situation.
Perhaps his jock-sniffing pathology outweighs everything else. He's also in way over his head in general. He can't promise tsun the world like he did with the juggalos, so attaching himself to the athletic department and co-opting it into his own personal brand is pretty much the only thing in his bag of tricks left.

I also think that the fact that UM's board is popularly elected might play into his reasoning. We've seen pretty clearly that a majority of their actual alums can't psychologically bring themselves to see any flaws or mistakes in the university (see: Eisen, Rich), so he may be able to rally most of them to his side. If he's also the hero to all the Walmarts who only care about football, are the regents going to turn on him and risk those votes.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top