-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter LordJeffBuck
- Start date
- Status
I have felt like I was typing a MBG special on many occasions.
Usually drunk
but not always
Upvote
0
BuckBackHome
Wolverine is largest member of weasel family
CMU students. Or so I have heard.
Upvote
0
Talk about missing the joke.
After the NCAA drops their hammer everyone in the program WILL enter the portal.
Upvote
0
sammyjenkis
Heisman
The punishment seems a lot like a way to let the year play out without harbaugh further embarrassing the B1G on live TV as ratings soar by either/all of being an insufferable bitch, getting into an argument with another coach postgame, or eating more burgers.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
sparcboxbuck
What happened to my ¤cash?
That’s totally how I am reading all of this. For the B1G to go as far as they have is already unprecedented. Considering that they exist for the preservation and advancement of the conference, to take any kind of punitive stance against one of their (note, I cannot bring myself to say ‘our own’) own, is — even if only symbolically — a pretty big deal.
They had to do something. The other 13 institutions are demanding action… and candidly, the fact that we’re not seeing any blowback from the ACC and SEC over some of the advanced scouting they were doing is fucking amazing to me. If if I were the ACC and SEC, I’d be using this to rub the B1G’s nose in this fucking pile of shit that those fuckers created.
Anyhow, the symbolic move of this action in combination with how the response has been written, the writing is on the wall that the expectation is that this will be addressed in due time. For now, this is what we can realistically do.
The B1G has been embarrassed by all of this. That program has embarrassed themselves within the member institutions and, sadly perhaps even more outside the conference with the advanced scouting of the ACC and SEC. Had it been only within the conference, a circle the wagons ‘we’ll address this among ourselves’ strategy likely would have been the path forward. The fact that it extended to other conferences AND was surfaced to the NCAA first puts all this dirty laundry out there for the world to see. *ichigan, you shit your own pants in front of everyone, you can’t be pissed that someone is calling attention to it.
Upvote
0
I think MBG quality posts here generally include too many in-jokes to be decipherable to outsiders.
Frankly we should have trended on multiple occasions with, ‘Has a team ever won a game only kicking field goals?’ jokes.
We were making memes out of our own board geniuses 19 years ago.
Upvote
0
I want to add this piece of Petitti’s letter, which discusses the NCAA evidence, into the thread for the record.
“C. The NCAA Shares with the Conference the Master Spreadsheet Detailing the Extensive In-Person Sign-Stealing Activities
Also on October 19, pursuant to my request to see first-hand the credible evidence in the NCAA’s possession, another senior-level Conference staff member and I participated in a videoconference with the NCAA. During that videoconference, the NCAA presented and discussed what it called a “master spreadsheet” that the NCAA had received during its investigation (the “Master Spreadsheet”). It included a very large amount of detailed information regarding the impermissible scheme, including, without limitation:
• a large and detailed chart listing the names of various individuals assigned to attend past and future football games involving the University’s scheduled football opponents;
• similar in-person attendance assignments for past and future games involving highly- ranked, non-Conference football opponents (presumably potential University football opponents in post-season games);
• notations showing whether in-person attendance at non-Conference games would be necessary depending on different win/loss scenarios;
• the 2023 game schedules of the University’s scheduled football opponents;
• color-coding to reflect past games actually attended by assigned individuals and
future games for which individual assignments were still needed;
• the names of individuals assigned to certain cities and locations; and
• monetary amounts associated with certain assigned games.
A separate worksheet within that Master Spreadsheet showed narrative translations of signs and signals that corresponded to specific team formations and plays. The name of the University staff member alleged to have orchestrated the scheme was prevalent in the Master Spreadsheet.”
“C. The NCAA Shares with the Conference the Master Spreadsheet Detailing the Extensive In-Person Sign-Stealing Activities
Also on October 19, pursuant to my request to see first-hand the credible evidence in the NCAA’s possession, another senior-level Conference staff member and I participated in a videoconference with the NCAA. During that videoconference, the NCAA presented and discussed what it called a “master spreadsheet” that the NCAA had received during its investigation (the “Master Spreadsheet”). It included a very large amount of detailed information regarding the impermissible scheme, including, without limitation:
• a large and detailed chart listing the names of various individuals assigned to attend past and future football games involving the University’s scheduled football opponents;
• similar in-person attendance assignments for past and future games involving highly- ranked, non-Conference football opponents (presumably potential University football opponents in post-season games);
• notations showing whether in-person attendance at non-Conference games would be necessary depending on different win/loss scenarios;
• the 2023 game schedules of the University’s scheduled football opponents;
• color-coding to reflect past games actually attended by assigned individuals and
future games for which individual assignments were still needed;
• the names of individuals assigned to certain cities and locations; and
• monetary amounts associated with certain assigned games.
A separate worksheet within that Master Spreadsheet showed narrative translations of signs and signals that corresponded to specific team formations and plays. The name of the University staff member alleged to have orchestrated the scheme was prevalent in the Master Spreadsheet.”
Upvote
0
ORD_Buckeye
Wrong glass, Sir.
My signature alone should get me on regardless of any post content.
Upvote
0
- Status