Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The timing is just odd. Blake's LLC expires, this one is formed a month later. Then Blake renews the original LLC 3 days before the NCAA officially launches an investigation and names Connor Stallions publicly.This is where I think it gets fun.
- registered agent
- articles of organization
- annual report.
So if Connor is just using Blake's name to further a business, the same Stallions that was been previously sued by an HOA, no doubt Corum will pursue legal action for misrepresentation. After all, if this guy is manifesto level nuts and rogue, you're going to want him held accountable, no?
This is where I need help. If Blake's lawyers were to have his name somehow expunged from this LLC, could the State not press charges if Corum (strangely and likely) elects not to?
Other than Connor's obvious subconscious desire to leave a trail of his deeds for historical purposes, why are their names on the Wyoming registration instead of a registered agent's? I thought the main purpose of using a Wyoming LLC is so that you can keep your identity hidden. Any guess on if it was truly for WY asset protection laws? Are the registered agent costs more significant than what in song ($50 per year) or is this simply another stupid, stupid oversight by him?1. Filing in Wyoming for something like this is suspicious.
Other than Connor's obvious subconscious desire to leave a trail of his deeds for historical purposes, why are their names on the Wyoming registration instead of a registered agent's? I thought the main purpose of using a Wyoming LLC is so that you can keep your identity hidden. Any guess on of it was truly for WY asset protection laws? Are the registered agent costs more significant than what in song ($50 per year) or is this simply another stupid, stupid oversight by him?
Michigan to Big Ten on Connor Stalions: "It is highly dubious that a junior analyst’s observations about the other side’s signals would have had a material effect on the integrity of competition - particularly when, according to present evidence, the other coaches did not know the basis for those observations."
They keep making these statements as though CS isn't on video communicating with coaches each play.
I read it is they are saying that they didn't know how Stallions got the information about the signals. It's a "we just thought he was really really smart" defense.
This defense 'shouldn't' help, since:
He was doing illegal things.
The team benefited.
Pretty much all there is to it.
These arrogant dumb fucks think they can just threaten the conference and TV networks and they'll cower out of fear.
When one of my guys fucks up, while he or she may answer to me or his/her contractor supervisor (depends on who it is), but when I'm speaking to the SES's and Colonel-birds, I'M the one that gets to field the questions, and answer the answers and come up with mitigation strategies to prevent said fuck-up from happening again.