Who is the deep threat that McLaurin and Dixon were? And then there's Campbell's explosive plays. We don't have another guy like Paris Campbell right now. Maybe Gill can become Paris Campbell like in a couple years but we lose Campbell's play making. What we got right now are some proven "move the chains" guys and a lot of guys who have pontential but haven't seen the field. Combine that and a new starter at QB and clearly we will have struggles.
Who needs deep threats when guys like Mack and Olave can actually catch the ball. Some times fans make too much of a big deal about WRs being deep threats, when as long as guys like Mack, Victor, Hill and Olave can get open in space and make plays moving the chains and hold on to the ball if in double coverage, those are every bit just as explosive plays. Fans get too enamored with 50+yd bombs, when a guy who consistently moves the chains is every bit as important(New England has continued a dynasty with this method).
And I think those chain moving WRs will open for a big play or 2 over the top, but I'd be happy if Fields is able to consistently lead the troops down the field. Our OL play will make sure we don't have struggles, because all of them have actual game reps under their belt(some more than others)
Upvote
0