• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
ysubuck;1972564; said:
Tattoos and selling game pants shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence with Miami zwem.

I wouldn't have a problem if you had said USC or UNC but you putting those two together, to my paranoid eyes, seems like you are giving the two situations equal billing.

The [Mark May] storm at Miami is an almost decade long middle finger at just about every rule in the NCAA book. Pryor and the others sold some of their [Mark May] for free tattoos. espin decided to make that their focus all summer long and, for that, Ohio State will get mentioned every [censored]ing time another program gets a story written about it. What Pryor and the others did is a parking ticket compared to what has gone on at USC, UNC, Miami, Oregon, and Auburn.

Sorry for the rant, but it [censored]es me off to hear people say "things that went on at Miami or Ohio State".

I'm not grouping those two incidents together. All I'm saying is things that went on at OSU probably goes on at other schools. Things like UNC or USC as well now that you mentioned it. It may not be as large of a scale as those schools. The same with Michigan with the extra practicing. They just got caught even if it was intentional or not. To me the OSU situation is a 3 on 1-10 serious scale. Miami is a flat out 10.
 
Upvote 0
WolverineMike;1972506; said:
for real. I'm not even really paying attention to this Miami story either. After 80% of the osu garbage got debunked, there's no point in putting stock into much until the NCAA actually does something. They are the ones who's opinion seems to matter in the end.

germ;1972504; said:
Actually the guy doing the blogging is not the most reliable source of accurate information, so most do not put much stock in anything he blogs about.

No need to spin, just wait for see what happens. I believe inaccurate reporting goes on these days, the last few months have proven this to be true.

zwem;1972484; said:
Disappointed, but I'm not shocked. Nobody really should be shocked at this. I'm sure the things that went on at OSU and Miami go around at other schools. Maybe not as large at Miami but it's there.

Just don't get caught or piss boosters off.:biggrin:

WolverineMike;1972567; said:
uh no, i'm pissed off that now we may have to deal with MORE ncaa problems because of stuff that happened under his watch. Seems like a pretty normal reaction to me.

and you "childishly" take a shot at UM fandom for turning our backs on someone we previously supported. That's pretty hypocritical considering the hate a lot of buckeyes have for Terrelle Pryor for getting Tress canned. And don't act like everyone one in buckeye nation is supporting him, because we all know that isn't the case.

So yeah, i'm well within my right to be pissed off at what could possibly be coming in the future wrt the recruiting TP situation.

zwem;1972671; said:
I'm not grouping those two incidents together. All I'm saying is things that went on at OSU probably goes on at other schools. Things like UNC or USC as well now that you mentioned it. It may not be as large of a scale as those schools. The same with Michigan with the extra practicing. They just got caught even if it was intentional or not. To me the OSU situation is a 3 on 1-10 serious scale. Miami is a flat out 10.

Hey, no worries! How about a happy song?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hW9bIQOR9JU"]Whistling in the Dark (Ukulele Original) - YouTube[/ame]
 
Upvote 0
shiznit7;1973517; said:
Per Michael Rothstein's Twitter:
Also a rumor floating around that LB Isiah Bell has left the program as well.

Neither was highly rated a a recruit and neither was in the projected two deep. This does not parallel what happened under RR.
 
Upvote 0
Oh, I agree that it's a completely different situation than RR. However, their biggest concern has to be the annual hits to their APR that will become an issue if the program continues to be a turnstile for transfers. Also, on an unrelated note, according to various UM websites, there are 4 walk-on players (Kovacs, Brink, Heininger, and Anderson) in their two-deep. Yikes
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Back
Top