BigWoof31;1958912; said:
They are better coaches too.
Better names, sure. Better coaches, yeah SEC probably has the edge by a bit.
Still, I don't think Steve Spurrier is an elite coach anymore. When's the last time he won anything? Miles - good coach? Yeah, but great coach? give me a break.
You have better recruiting pools which leads to better talent which leads to better teams. If you swap coaches amongst the B10 and SEC I honestly don't really see much of a difference.
Saban is an excellent coach. Dan Mullens after what he did at MSU I would say he is a good coach. Chizik - obviously he has a NC thanks to sCAM but look at his years at Iowa State. Muschamp we'll find out but Meyer was a great coach. Richt I think is a very good coach but I don't know if i'd give him elite status since he really hasn't won anything but a lot of games.
We "had" Tressel/Paterno (name recognition alone, I know he's not much of a coach these days). I think Ferentz is a very good coach considering the recruiting classes he brings in. D'Antonio has turned every program he's ever touched around and seems to be really making an impression at MSU. Bielema is young and has been churning out 10 win seasons. Pelini managed to turn Nebraska around in a hurry and is putting a solid program back together. Fitzgerald has done decent with what little he's had to work with.
I think the SEC is better at the top, but after the first couple coaches it's a tossup. You give D'Antonio/Ferentz/Bielema/Fitzgerald the talent that a Bama/Florida/LSU/Georgia/Auburn field and I don't see much of a difference in the teams performances.
SEC has more "characters" which is where they win, B10 coaches outside of Pelini are pretty boring in front of a camera (well, can't discount Paterno)