nwbuckeye;1644488; said:While the starter at quarterback is a no brainer, the backup situation really has me scratching my head. Look at the running backs thread and I see everybody commenting on the luxury of having 6-7 potentially really good rb's in the fold and how lucky we are. Contrast that with the quarterback situation and IMO it is a travesty that THE Ohio State University has one awesome starter and 2 very unproven backups who if God forbid anything happened to TP, do any of you think could step in and be anything but adequate.
Absolutely no offense at all to either of these young men but when I see programs like Cincinnati be able to have their starter in Pike go down with an injury and have somebody like Collaros step in and the offense hardly misses a beat, it makes me wonder why we do not have maybe one less 4 star rb and perhaps one more quarterback of the future in the fold. Does anybody not think that Pryor going down would turn the 2010 team from a possible 12-0 national contender to an immediate 8-4 non BCS bowl team in a heartbeat. tOSU has never exactly been a quarterback factory, but it seems we have absolutely no backup plan if we lose our starter and our lack of quarterbacks on hand and in the pipeline really concerns me. Not too many teams can have their star qb go down and not take a huge hit in talent, but our step down seems almost nonexistant.
Anyways, what I do hope to see is our offense clicking like crazy in 2010 and that our backup qb's DO get plently of playing time because of big first half leads. Hopefully they will prove my assessment of our lack of depth at qb is way off base via the garbage time route and not the other way that I dare not mention again.
The RB's are the backup plan. I don't think for a second that if Pryor went down they'd lose four games. Not with the RB's tOSU has.
Cincinnati may have two decent QB's against shit teams in the Big East, but they traded a defense to get them.
Upvote
0