HuskerFromOhio;1787804; said:
150+130 are heisman/all time great #s when your first 5 games are 200 + 180.
Denard put up:
200/200
250/250
240/100
280/220
BG is an outlier, he only played 2 series + 1 play. He was averaging 63 yds per series
150/130 is a huge dropoff in production from the numbers he is putting up, and would rightly point to the level of competition as the catalyst for his inflated statistics.
He is putting up 250 yards a game in just one half of his statistics, yet you want to call him a lock if his numbers sink to 280 yds combined.
You don't understand that with 150/130 he will end up with 2000/1800.

Yes, I don't understand what you typed, and the statistics that I tallied up (at a 75% rate going forward). Nice one
I know you are an Ohio State fan and Michigan is your rivals and it sucks conceding that one of there players is that great especially when you have a better team but he is that great.
That has nothing to do with it. If Pryor was dominating against Toledo, Akron, E Mich, Ohio & Indiana, folks would talk about his heisman hopes but would definitely point to the upcoming defenses as a better test for his skills & candidacy.
Denard puts up crazy numbers for 3 unique reasons:
1. He is a rare talent
2. For some bizarre reason, UM struggles to get consistent RB play opposite him in the read option.
3. His dominance is paired with such horrible help that he doesn't get to sub out during blowouts or milk the clock with handoffs.