The hyperbole that has engulfed b10 discussions around the country, and on UM boards to downgrade OSU's success, is simply remarkable. Let's hope thinly veiled shots like these are the exception to the norm, fla.blueinfla;1446068; said:I'm not saying this list is correct or anything because I don't think it is. However, you could make a claim the Tressel is further down the list because he has the best talent in the conference and despite being able to win in a very down Big10 conference, what else has he done?
Michigan had just as much incoming talent, and it's horseradish to try and revise history because the last few seasons haven't been good. The big ten was quite strong in 02, 03 & 05, and pretty good in 06.He's been bringing in top 10 talent every year, but what does he have to show for it? One MNC with players he inherited? Two other MNC game appearances where his team forgot to show up?
If we're making this about talent, then the LSU game went exactly as it should have gone. There was no comparison between the talent on the two rosters, in particular the senior classes facing off. One was a top-2 class, the other barely cracked the top-25 before it lost most of it to attrition.
Somehow you conveniently forgot to apply your rather harsh standards to other members of that list... like say, the top ranked person.I don't agree with the list, but I, at least, can see where the author was coming from.
5, 7 & 6 loss seasons are terrible performances, even with Iowa talent. What makes it worse is it came on the heels of a top-10 recruiting class. One 9-3 campaign where they didn't play OSU or Michigan does not change that.
Upvote
0