• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread (2004) Game Seven: Indiana - 10/23/04 (W, 4-3/1-3)

Woah, Clarity -- no bias here. All I want to see is our guys handing the ball to the ref after every play. If anything, I prefer the traditional drop back passer who has the height to see over the line, but I am all about Tressel's quarterback oath: "This above all things. First, do no harm." :wink:

Smith did have several throws that could have been picked. JZ has also had some INTs dropped, including a sure pick six, so that cuts both ways. We'll see what the coaches do this week.

Much bigger issue is Pittman. Someone rightly pointed out that Smith's job was made much easier by the productive running game. Yes, Indiana makes a living by making OSU backs look good, but Pittman did some very quantifiable things that Ross doesn't do. He made cuts, he read holes, he kept his legs driving, gave second effort, didn't go down at the lightest touch. This guy is our back, as far as I am concerned. He's got almost as many yards as Ross this season on just over half as many carries. I just don't see how there could be any debate at this point. Ross, for the second time in his career is going to get bumped for a Freshman.
 
Upvote 0
BuckPshrink said:
Regardless of superior standing or parity, etc... todays offense deserves the opportunity to struggle in"real time" and that begins next week at noon.

If nothing else, the o-line has a game film worthy of study, Troy has the ability to adjust to w.v. s, I am looking forward to Many adjustments which have not been possible before! How do you adjust SUCK!
Todays team played with heat, a good thing from my seat!!!
How do you adjust suck?

I am still laughing.
 
Upvote 0
I've made the mistake today of speaking past specific posters towards groups that I'm not addressing directly. That doesn't really make sense as an explanation, or a practice, but it is what it is.

I'm all for Smith getting a real shot at the starting job. I can't think of any public reason why he shouldn't have that. While I don't think he's yet shown a significant leap over Zwick overall, I stress the yet. We won't know unless he gets his shot. He's certainly, in the little time he's had in the #1 role, not shown anything that would put him *behind* Zwick in ability and performance. Not significantly. Obviously each has their positives and negatives, and I'm just waiting for one to really step forward and grab the job by the ears in order to 'adjust suck'.

Zero debate on Pittman. Totally different scenario, I agree. Pittman has shown more than *any* other RB we have, just about every single time he's played. And here, I think it's safe to say that it's definitely a perceptible leap over the others. He's quick, he seems to have good vision, and whether it was against Indiana or not (I did note that Hall broke a relatively big run too, so there is that), he managed to break out of tackles. Something we haven't seen since HIM left. Count me firmly in the "we know enough about Pittman to decisively want to call him our starter" column.

Anyway, like I said earlier. Just nice to be talking about positives that can lead towards MORE wins, rather than what we'd like to see in order just to get one period. :wink:



BrutusBobcat said:
Woah, Clarity -- no bias here. All I want to see is our guys handing the ball to the ref after every play. If anything, I prefer the traditional drop back passer who has the height to see over the line, but I am all about Tressel's quarterback oath: "This above all things. First, do no harm." :wink:

Smith did have several throws that could have been picked. JZ has also had some INTs dropped, including a sure pick six, so that cuts both ways. We'll see what the coaches do this week.

Much bigger issue is Pittman. Someone rightly pointed out that Smith's job was made much easier by the productive running game. Yes, Indiana makes a living by making OSU backs look good, but Pittman did some very quantifiable things that Ross doesn't do. He made cuts, he read holes, he kept his legs driving, gave second effort, didn't go down at the lightest touch. This guy is our back, as far as I am concerned. He's got almost as many yards as Ross this season on just over half as many carries. I just don't see how there could be any debate at this point. Ross, for the second time in his career is going to get bumped for a Freshman.
 
Upvote 0
zincfinger,
I have watched a few Penn St. games and I am sorry but there offense is just painful to watch. There is so much confusion and so many mental mistakes. That would construe as a terrible team! Also add the fact that they are 2-5 makes it even more apparent. I'll give you that they do indeed have a pretty good defense but 2-5 by anyones standard is not a terrific team but more terrible, so don't read too much into my post, it was ment to refer to the team as a whole.
Yes, Penn St. will give OSU more of a challenge than Indiana did because they do have a better defense. The key for OSU is going to be to keep this success rolling and do well on offense. The defense should be able to handle Penn States' offense pretty well.

I still think if OSU improves and beats PSU and then goes on to possibly beat an even better team in MSU, then we have a great chance to beat one of the last two games of the year (hopefully at least the last one !! Thats going to be the harder one though IMO.. HEY.. A GUY CAN DREAM!!). If OSU goes on to beat tsun I'd be in heaven this year !!!!

Clarity, In reference to your QB saga. It's only my opinion, but isn't the Offensive line soooo much more of an important issue with respect to maturity, and if they sustain their blocks and knock the piss outta their opponents than the QB's?? Whomever is in at QB will do fine if the O-line does that. Thats the most important thing that this Offense has been lacking in previous weeks. They did show alot more heart today though. I will add that Troy did in fact look crisp and made fast decisions in his passing. Troy has not yet faced a Wisconsin-like team and gotten pummeled over and over only seconds after the ball was snapped though. We'll see how crisp he does against Penn St. and MSU.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
StoRMinBrutus said:
Clarity, In reference to your QB saga. Only in my opinion, but isn't the Offensive line soooo much more of an important issue of maturity, and if they sustain their blocks and knock the piss outta their opponents than the QB?? Whomever is in at QB will do fine if they do that. Thats the most important thing to this Offense that has been lacking. I will say Troy looked crisp and made fast decisions in his passing but then again he has not faced a Wisconsin-like team and gotten pummeled only 2 seconds after the ball was snapped over and over and over again. We'll see how crisp he does against Penn St. and MSU. I will be so happy if Troy or whomever is in at QB does well and if OSU wins.

Absolutely. I've actually said a few times I don't really care who starts next week. An argument could be made for either Smith or Zwick. I think because Smith started this week, and did absolutely nothing to lose the job, he should remain in it next weeks. Sucks when a player is displaced more because of injury than performance (and I use that language because of comments JT has made), but that's the sport. But I won't have too hard a time either way.

I put a ton of things before the QB issue when it comes to our struggles this season. Including, but not limited to, the OL, OL coaching, OL practice/prep, RBs, RB coaching, offensive playcalling (literally and figuratively), discipline, energy, and even defense. It just happens that Smith/Zwick seems to be the majority's focus.

OSUsushichic said:
Regarding the QB issue, if the majority of the team wants Smith, then I want Smith (with the deleted thread topic in mind).

You would have to think about why Smith is more liked, and why Justin is less, I think. Or rather, I feel a better understanding of that issue would help a lot of people form an opinion of how it should or shouldn't translate to their own perception.

To be frank, I don't care who the majority of the team likes or doesn't like. Any of them that have aspirations of going pro better grow up quickly and learn to not let that type of garbage get into their heads, nor affect their games.
 
Upvote 0
Re: certain recievers tanking b/c of the qb decision ...

This crossed my mind a couple weeks ago, but I realized (assuming we are thinking of the same two recievers) that these recievers have alot riding on these games either due to their professional aspirations or pressure for playing time from all the other talented guys, that they woulnd't risk gaining the rep of having bad hands/being poor route runners for it.

Plus, IU's secondary was playing with a ton of cushion today.
 
Upvote 0
WestEnd said:
Re: certain recievers tanking b/c of the qb decision ...

This crossed my mind a couple weeks ago, but I realized (assuming we are thinking of the same two recievers) that these recievers have alot riding on these games either due to their professional aspirations or pressure for playing time from all the other talented guys, that they woulnd't risk gaining the rep of having bad hands/being poor route runners for it.

Plus, IU's secondary was playing with a ton of cushion today.
Good point, but I have to disagree a bit. A rep for dropping balls and running poor routes won't keep a physically gifted receiver out of the NFL - just look at how many chances Ken-Yon Rambo has got.
 
Upvote 0
A rep for dropping balls and running poor routes won't keep a physically gifted receiver out of the NFL

For sure that's true ... my point is just that there's to much on the line for these kids to just go out there and tank it in an attempt to make a teammate look bad. Plus, they all know that the coaches won't hold it too much against zwick if they see that alot of things that went wrong weren't totally his fault.
 
Upvote 0
I understand you're reiterating what Tressel has said. But Zwick has fumbled 6 and threw 6 interceptions. To me, Smith may not have been great but he certainly took care of the ball. If Smith continues to take care of it maybe the offensive line has gotten better or we're seeing Zwick struggling to live up to his reputation--too early and too difficult to say at this juncture.
 
Upvote 0
kn1f3party said:
I understand you're reiterating what Tressel has said. But Zwick has fumbled 6 and threw 6 interceptions. To me, Smith may not have been great but he certainly took care of the ball. If Smith continues to take care of it maybe the offensive line has gotten better or we're seeing Zwick struggling to live up to his reputation--too early and too difficult to say at this juncture.

Agreed, and I added that caveat because I don't really buy the line he gave the media. I mean, whether it be because you don't think he's performing well enough, or if you want to take him out as an act of mercy lest you fry the kid, few people would argue against Smith getting a shot at this point in the season. Whether or not it will end up being a permanent change, I think this break for Justin can be as advantageous for him as it can be for Smith. It would be hard to say Zwick was progressing much in the face of all our problems during the last few games, and sometimes it can do a QB good to catch a few games from the sidelines. I hope that if and when we see him return to the starting job (and I'll reiterate the 'if', lest some lurker make assumptions about my message here), we'll see a player who has been able to combine his game experience with his sideline experience watching a peer, and turn that into some personal changes that might improve his performance.

I don't know if that made sense, and it's a horrific sentence, but I'm tired. Lol. Totally agree on the "too early and too difficult" theme. Time is going to be the only thing that answers all the questions we have.

I still have a hard time buying into the "but Smith took care of the ball" issue, where it's suggestive that he went above and beyond Zwick's level of performance on the same issue. He didn't have any INTs, but not because he did something special, or made great reads and throws all day -- rather because the Hoosier D is inept, and his WRs made some great plays on the ball. He (Smith) made some of the same decisions and throws that have led to INTs when Zwick was just getting started as well.

The thing is, and the thing that seems to differentiate me from many others, is that I accept turnovers, mistakes and growing pains as part of a young QB's progression. So I don't think less of Smith as a QB for the mistakes he made today, and I don't think less of Zwick because of his struggles in the face of offensive problems that, while he was a part of, were certainly much greater than himself. At the same time, I'm also not awed by the things they do right in individual games. It's more a big picture issue for me, and while I understand that others (not necessarily talking about you, or anyone else I've talked with today) get caught up in the extreme highs and lows of individual game or play performances -- I just don't see any merit in it. At all. I've seen a game where Brett Favre imploded and threw 6 or more picks. I've seen games where he responded the same way, but instead of leading to an implosion, he tore a defensive secondary to shreds with throws that shouldn't really be physically possible? Which is representative of him as a QB? The answer is neither really, but both of these rolled into the big picture starts to tell a story relative to all the other games he's played.

But I digress.

As far as 6 and 6, that's misleading I think, given the number of those that were in Zwick's first 2 games, the gross disparity between some of the defenses JZ has faced, and the one TS did today. It's also effectively impossible to compare 5 1/2 games played, to 1 1/2. In fact, I still maintain that trying to draw direct parallels between two players at the same position against different teams under different circumstances, is a bit pointless. But we've got to go on what we've got, so here we all are. Smith's completion % doesn't stand out against Zwick's, his decision making/pass selection didn't either. He too overthrew some wide open receivers. Maybe he won't next week, looking forward to finding out. Where Smith did look better, I thought, were in terms of how "pretty" the passes were, the velocity on them while still having some touch when he needed it, and certainly his ability to scramble.

Anyway, I'm off to sleep, and am done with the Smith/Zwick issue for this week. :wink:
 
Upvote 0
Lets all come back after the PSU and MSU games and then make a more educated guess between Justin and Troy. That way Troy will have played a somewhat better defense than Indiana. Neither of these teams will come close to the hits Justin took at the NcSt or Wisconsin games but it will have to do. I personally don't care who starts as long as he can command the Offense as a true leader. As long as he can pump the Offensive line to block better and too protect him. Thats the guy.
I so agree Clarity in that this may be a blessing in disguise for Justin Zwick. He may need to take a step back and look at things, and slow the game down from the sidelines. He does have to take advantage of his next opportunity in the game and become a leader or else. That the one thing I don't see from him yet, but then again I am not in the huddle so I don't know for sure. Whomever it is though, I'll cheer for them because they are a Buckeyes !!!
GO BUCKEYES !!!
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top