Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Except that's incredibly unlikely with 5 returning RBs & 1-2 newcomers.I wouldn't want to see another scenario next year where we're left with 2 schollie RBs and have to possibly play walk ons.
Boren has taken the FB position by storm.I think Martin could get moved back to FB, opening up a spot for Howard, and I'm saying that just because of the possible depth that we could have at TB. And a player or 2 could possibly RS as well.
mendensa;1604235; said:Well put. I agree. You can't forget just 2 years ago when USC was hyped as having the best stable of RB's in the country. They were all over SI and other sports magazine covers. They started camp being 8-10 deep @ TB. And if I remember correctly, due to injury, transfers, academics, ect... they were down to 2 or 3 by week 7 or 8. And what was a position of depth @ the beginning of the year turned out to be a position of weakness with not a lot of experience (tho very talent-filled). You can never have too many good RB's.
If you can bring in another quality RB, you do it. Especially if the kid has the talent to play on any Big 10 team and HE WANTS TO BE A BUCKEYE. He may not get his chance to shine until his Jr. or Sr. year, but a lot of guys that come to OSU are like that. I'm sure he is aware of the numbers @ the position. He can play here, he wants to be here, I hope he gets it.
jwinslow;1603849; said:Except that's incredibly unlikely with 5 returning RBs & 1-2 newcomers.Boren has taken the FB position by storm.
pnuts34;1604368; said:But even with Boren pretty locked in at FB, you don't think we need multiple FBs with the amount we run the ball? Wouldn't a little more athleticism at the position be a good thing?
And it would be nice to have 8 quarterbacks, 30 OL, & 20 WRs, but there isn't room to just add that kind of depth. OSU's rb depth chart is already stacked, it doesn't need more bodies.Wouldn't a little more athleticism at the position be a good thing?
jwinslow;1604413; said:And it would be nice to have 8 quarterbacks, 30 OL, & 20 WRs, but there isn't room to just add that kind of depth. OSU's rb depth chart is already stacked, it doesn't need more bodies.
Who is he going to beat out on D? I'm sure he'd like to play D, but he's a much bigger asset at FB.Boren is moving to D. He prefers to play D but helped out at FB this year because of need.