• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

LGHL You’re Nuts: If the Big Ten expands to 24 teams, what six schools would you want to add?

You’re Nuts: If the Big Ten expands to 24 teams, what six schools would you want to add?
Matt Tamanini
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


NCAA Football: Notre Dame at Ohio State

Joseph Maiorana-USA TODAY Sports

Your (almost) daily dose of good-natured, Ohio State banter.

Everybody knows that one of the best parts of being a sports fan is debating and dissecting the most (and least) important questions in the sporting world with your friends. So, we’re bringing that to the pages of LGHL with our favorite head-to-head column: You’re Nuts.

In You’re Nuts, two LGHL staff members will take differing sides of one question and argue their opinions passionately. Then, in the end, it’s up to you to determine who’s right and who’s nuts.

Today’s Question: If the Big Ten were to expand to 24 teams, what six schools would you want to add?​


Jami’s Take: ​


With the Pac-12 as we know it on the brink of complete collapse as Pac-12 teams scramble to join the Big Ten or Big 12, it seems the era of superconferences has finally arrived. The writing has been on the wall for a while, and with the playoff expansion, it seems likely that decades of tradition are on their way out the door.

So far, UCLA and USC have committed to joining the Big Ten in 2024, with Washington and Oregon to follow suit as the conference expands westward. Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah, for their part, have scurried to the Big 12, leaving behind just four teams.

But the Pac-12 isn’t the only conference that could dissolve. The ACC could look to expand themselves down the road, but at the moment, schools like FSU are threatening to walk, and the SEC could bite if this happens, sending the ACC the way of the Pac-12.

Much of this realignment is — as are most things — motivated by money (in this case, the media rights deals and payouts of the respective conferences), and as it stands, the ACC is locked into a long-term rights deal with a steep, nine-figure exit fee. But if schools stand to make more money in the long run, we could see some schools buying themselves out, especially given the fact that the Big Ten and SEC deals come with higher annual payouts.

Alternatively, schools and conferences could be thinking ahead as far as 2036 when the ACC deal ends. If the likes of Clemson are willing to jump ship, the Big Ten and SEC would be waiting to take that call.

If superconferences are the way of the future, it seems unlikely the Big Ten is done adding teams, so Matt and I are dreaming big and each picking the six teams we’d like to see join the Big Ten (Big 24?). Since we’re adding teams in pairs, I’ve chosen three duos I’d love to make regular conference opponents.

Cal and Stanford​


We’ve already netted Oregon, whose duck mascot is legendary. Let’s add the most chaotic mascot to the mix (the Stanford Tree. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, do yourself a favor and google this most delightful, cursed icon).

Don’t worry though, anthropomorphic trees aren’t the only thing these teams would bring to the Big Ten. Stanford brings a competitive football program that has the potential to be a sleeper team. It’s unlikely they’ll win the conference in their current iterations, but they have the potential to add some chaos. This is not a team you can look past when you play them. They could go on to become what Tennessee is to the SEC (full respect to Tennessee, Go Vols): Not always given the respect of an Alabama or Georgia, but almost always good enough to ruin a few seasons. It keeps things interesting, and I like the idea of having them in the fold.

Cal, for its part, tends to be more middle-to-bottom-of-the-pack, but in a superconference, they would certainly be competitive with the likes of the Purdues, Indianas, and Northwesterns of the world, and again, none of these are teams we can truly look past. On a good day, these are all still teams that have the potential to hand even the most dominant team a big L. Also, not for nothing, it is good for fandoms when teams have more games in which they are competitive, and Cal does that for a lot of the teams in the Big Ten. There’s a reason to buy in, and it would be fun to have this in the Big Ten (and selfishly, it would give me more excuses to get to the Bay Area as your California LGHL rep).

This duo also brings non-mainstream sports into the fold, adding some feathers to the Big Ten’s cap in sports like golf, swimming, and tennis. It could be extremely fun across the board to see this additional competition in other sports, and it would serve us well to remember the benefits of superconferences that can go far beyond football season for all parties involved.

One final note: We’ve already added four West Coast teams. That is a BRUTAL time change for teams in both directions. Adding Cal and Stanford would give West Coast teams more games on their coast, which does feel like an important consideration in the interest of fairness.

FSU and Clemson ​


This is a dream world. I might be an idiot, but I’m not that much of an idiot — I know the most likely scenario if these teams move to dissolve the ACC as we know it would be a leap to the SEC.

But hear me out — these teams both have a clearer path to the playoffs in the Big Ten. Even in an expanded playoff, the SEC has enough top-dog teams in any given season that FSU and even Clemson would have to work for their playoff spot. In the Big Ten, Clemson’s spot would almost surely be locked in, and FSU has a clear path. From a more selfish standpoint, having these teams would force OSU, Michigan, Penn State, and Michigan State (or any other team making a run for the playoff) and would give them a better taste of what they’ll face in a potential playoff opponent. Adding some heavy-hitting competition makes everyone better, and that’s a win for the Big Ten as much as it’s a clear playoff path for Clemson and FSU.

UNC and Duke ​


Superconference realignment has ramifications that go beyond football season, and UNC and Duke as a pairing would add some additional basketball dominance to the Big Ten. As in-state rivals in North Carolina, they’d also bring that rivalry energy to a conference that, as we all know, thrives on rivalries. I respect the disdain these programs and fanbases have for each other, born out of proximity and pettiness (fueled by Art Heyman’s decision to renege on his commitment to play basketball at UNC and play for Duke instead in the early 1960s). That’s got Bo and Woody energy, and I’d like to see it make its way to the Big Ten.


Matt’s Take: ​


I think that Jami’s picks are all logical and solid, however, I’ve got a different vision for the Big Ten than she does. While I don’t think the B1G would be able to pillage any notable team from the SEC, I believe that — should the league want to expand to 24 teams — it should be looking to claim every other significant college football team.

So, while I can appreciate the academics and Olympic-sport prowess of Cal and Stanford — and who doesn’t love The Big Game and reliving “The band is on the field!” every year — these conference realignment moves are solely about football, so the decisions should be made with that in mind. While getting the San Francisco market in the media mix would be nice, I would venture to guess that having UCLA and USC to the south and Washington and Oregon to the north would go a long way in that region anyway.

So, what I am proposing is to grab every non-SEC football school of note and make the Big Ten the Captain Planet of football conferences:

“MIDWEST! SO CAL! PACIFIC NORTHWEST! ATLANTIC OCEAN! GREAT PLAINS! By your powers combined... I AM THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE!”



Do all of these potential additions make logistical sense? Not at all, travel partners be damned. Do they fit in with the history and tradition of the conference? Of course not, but tradition doesn’t matter in college football anymore apparently. But will they help the

1) Notre Dame​


The Fighting Irish have been the Big Ten’s white whale for generations. I understand that the powers that be at ND would prefer to remain independent, and I actually kind of get that, it’s important to them, it’s part of their identity. It’s like how the Sprouse kids’ character in “Big Daddy” wanted to be called Frankenstein, there’s no real value or reason to it, but it was important for them, so Adam Sandler (a.k.a. the rest of the college football world) just has to go along with it.

But here’s the thing, it can’t stay like that forever. Eventually, the money that they could be making in a conference is going to be so much more substantial than what they can make in a solo deal with NBC that they will have no choice but to sign up for a league. Even notable Notre Dame alum and legacy Mike Golic Jr. told me that on the podcast earlier this week.


The other option to get ND into the B1G is if the way that college football reorganizes itself makes it more difficult for the Domers to make the College Football Playoff and win a national title. The elimination of the Pac-12 from an auto-berth might make it easier for them to get a bye or host a game, but if they eliminate automatic bids, a flood of SEC and B1G teams could make it harder for the Irish to get in, which could lead the school to finally slumming it with us conference members.

2) Florida State​


Does adding a team from Florida into the Big Ten make sense? Nope, but we’ve got California, Washington, and Oregon, so at least they are in the Eastern timezone. The Seminoles have made it clear that they are not super happy with their current arrangement with the ACC. While the grant of rights agreement with ESPN might make it difficult for them to leave, they don’t want to be there anymore, and there would be a big old cushion of money for the ‘Noles to fall back on in the Big Ten whenever they decided to leave.

While the SEC might make more geographical sense for Florida State, we all know that there has always been a healthy competition between the UF and FSU, so how do you beat them? Not by joining their conference

3) Miami​


Despite all of the decades of NCAA violations and illegal activity (who amongst us, amirite?), in many ways, the Hurricanes are more of a Big Ten school than an SEC school. This year, Miami accepted an invitation to join the Association of American Universities (AAU), which had long been required for Big Ten membership. So from an academic standpoint, they would fit perfectly.

From a football perspective, they have an impressive history and still aspire to championship levels, but are more often than not left to cling to the glories of the past. What’s more Big Ten than that?

4) Clemson​


Look, there’s no football program that I despise more than Clemson — including TTUN and the Nits — but if you are going to build an anti-SEC Death Star, you can’t not take Dabo. So, grudgingly,

5) Utah​


Here’s where I start to venture a wee bit outside of the normal train of thought. I know that Utah isn’t exactly a traditional national title contender, but under Kyle Whittingham, the Utes have become one of the most consistently competitive teams in the country. With the disillusion of the Pac-12, Utah has instantly become one of the best programs in the Big 12 and their profile will likely only increase because of it. Also, adding a quality team between Nebraska and the West Coast would be nice not only for travel purposes but for geographical domination, it helps to lock up that part of the country.

6) Boise State​


Ok, now hear me out. I know that the blue turf is offputting, but don’t discount the Broncos just because of that. Boise State would easily be a mid-tier SEC program competing with the Arkansases, Vanderbilts, Missouris, Mississippi States, and Auburns of that part of the world.

Don’t believe me? Pop quiz, hot shot; which college football program has the most wins since 2000? That’s right, it’s Boise with 112, with traditional SEC teams Texas and Oklahoma tied with 110, then long-time Big Ten rivals Ohio State and USC tied at 102. So, adding a third B1G squad to that list would be pretty helpful in our Captain Planet plan.

Also, this would mean that save for the strip of Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, there would be a path of Big Ten states from the Atlantic all the way to the Pacific. So, if Coach Prime can get the Buffs back to respectability, maybe we can fit in that last puzzle piece with the B1G goes to 26!



Continue reading...

LGHL Devin Brown still very much in the mix to start at quarterback for the Buckeyes

Devin Brown still very much in the mix to start at quarterback for the Buckeyes
justingolba
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


Ohio State v Penn State

Photo by Scott Taetsch/Getty Images

No matter who gets the starting nod this year, Brown has a bright future in Columbus

Every day from now until the start of the season, Land-Grant Holy Land is highlighting Ohio State football players that you should be watching this season. Check out all of our “Player to Watch” articles to get ready for the season opener against Indiana.



The Ohio State Buckeyes play in five days to open the 2023 season against the Indiana Hoosiers, and we have no idea who the starting quarterback will be.

Now, no need to panic. I know everyone reading this will have nightmares about J.T. Barrett and Cardale Jones in 2015 and how hard it was to watch when no one on the coaching staff would commit to either quarterback, and neither of them could ever find a rhythm.

Even though it is almost definite that both Kyle McCord and Devin Brown will play in the opener, you can bet head coach Ryan Day will make a choice on the starter at the very latest before the Notre Dame game on Sep. 23, and will stay committed to that guy throughout the season.


But, as of right now, we do not know who that will be. Will it be McCord or Brown? Or could it be Tristian Gebbia!? (It won’t be Gebbia).

Brown has only taken one snap as a Buckeye, but he came in as a highly touted recruit in the 2022 class. Brown was listed as a four-star prospect by 247Sports from Corner Canyon High School in Draper, Utah. He was the No. 44 recruit overall in the 2022 class, the No. 5 quarterback, and the No. 2 player in the state of Utah.

This is what Blair Angulo, the Mountain Region Recruiting Analyst for 247Sports, had to say about Brown as he exited high school:

“Long, wiry frame with room to add muscle mass. Carries 190 lbs. well and continues to fill out. He is a dynamic quarterback with a basketball background. Shows very good arm strength and zip on his passes. Flashes ability to make off-platform throws without losing velocity. Distributes to all levels of the field and looks extremely comfortable rolling out to space. Displays good timing and anticipation over the middle. Mechanically sound and quick to release the football. He is athletic and tough enough to plant his foot and gain yards with his legs...”

McCord and Brown have battled it out all spring, with neither quarterback seemingly gaining an advantage one way or the other. Back to the point I made above, ESPN’s Pete Thamel reported last week that he expects McCord and Brown to both play against Indiana.

“I actually talked to Ryan Day this morning and this will be a battle right through the Indiana game,” Thamel told College Football Live host Kelsey Riggs. “He said as of right now, he expects to play both quarterbacks in that game. There’s a big scrimmage for Ohio State on Saturday. That could maybe determine who does become the starter, eventually. Interesting battle. Kyle McCord, a little more veteran, a little more polished. He’s kind of a more drop-back guy. Devin Brown’s got a little more wiggle to him and a little more of a dual-threat.”

“What they want is to find a quarterback because they have to build an identity,” Thamel continued.” They go to Notre Dame Sept. 23. By then, they certainly want to have that battle set.”

So it seems confirmed that we will see both quarterbacks against Indiana. The other two games before the Notre Dame showdown are against Youngstown State and Western Kentucky, so we likely would not learn too much about either player in those games.

Whether Brown starts all year or not, all signs are pointing to him being a contributor at least early in the season, and then being the guy next in line to McCord — as McCord was to C.J. Stroud.

Continue reading...

LGHL Can Kyle McCord hold off Devin Brown and become QB1?

Can Kyle McCord hold off Devin Brown and become QB1?
JordanW330
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


Ohio State Spring Football Game

Photo by Ben Jackson/Getty Images

McCord is entering the most important two-week stretch of his collegiate career.

Every day from now until the start of the season, Land-Grant Holy Land is highlighting Ohio State football players that you should be watching this season. Check out all of our “Player to Watch” articles to get ready for the season opener against Indiana.



It’s late August and Ohio State doesn’t have a starting quarterback. Head coach Ryan Day has chosen to not name a starter because he believes two things to be true: One, neither quarterback has separated themselves from the other, and two, both quarterbacks are good enough to be the starter.

If you’re on social media you’ve seen a multitude of takes from Ohio State fans, Ohio State haters, and national media pundits. Some people think that both quarterbacks are bad and OSU will take a step back. Others think they’re both really good and Day is being honest when he says that both are starting caliber.

There is always the sentiment that when you have two quarterbacks you don’t have any but I don’t think that is always true. Ohio State fans are split on who they want to start. On one side you have the fans who think that if McCord, the more experienced quarterback, hasn’t won the job outright, then they should give the job to Brown. Others — and I lean more in this camp — believe you give the job to the older guy.

My reasoning for this is that if you start McCord you have more options.

Option one: You start him and he’s not good so you bench him for Brown.

Option two: You start him, he’s excellent and he goes to the NFL after one season and Brown is the starter next year, allowing you to have both of them start in their OSU career.

Option three: You start him and he’s good, but after the season Devin Brown wins the job in the spring, which is what happened with rival Michigan between incumbent starter Cade McNamara and JJ McCarthy.

If you start Brown, you only have one option, and that is Brown starts for two seasons, and McCord transfers as soon as the season is over. McCord has been loyal to Ohio State, but after three seasons and losing two competitions, he would be in the transfer portal as soon as the NCAA allows.

All of this hinges on both quarterbacks being equal. This brings us to McCord, to this the most important two-week stretch of his career. He has been battling Brown for the starting job since the spring. He has two weeks left to win the job, otherwise, he will effectively end his Ohio State career. Whether it’s at Ohio State or elsewhere I think McCord will be successful and maybe even an NFL Draft pick, but the chances of that happening at Ohio State are getting slimmer and slimmer by the second.

It seems as though this QB competition will go into the season, which I’m not sure benefits McCord. Brown is the better athlete, he brings more to the table with the QB run game and Ohio State fans almost always support the younger player. McCord needs to leverage his unquestionable talent, his extra year in the system, and the connection he’s built with superstar wide receiver Marvin Harrison Jr. since they played together in high school.

McCord needs to close the door on Brown before the season starts because unless Brown goes out and throws multiple interceptions, I think McCord may be on the wrong end of the fanbase once Brown gets into the game. I’ve been on team McCord since he stepped on campus. I believed he would be at Ohio State longer than Quinn Ewers and was proven right. I think McCord has everything it takes to lead Ohio State to Ryan Day’s first national championship, but he’s running out of time to prove that to Ryan Day and offensive coordinator Brian Hartline.

McCord is not only fighting for his job, he’s fighting for his future in Columbus. Time to see if he has what it takes to hold off Devin Brown for a couple more weeks.



Connect with Jordan on Twitter: @JordanW330

Continue reading...

LGHL Ohio State Football Countdown: 5

Ohio State Football Countdown: 5
Gene Ross
via our friends at Land-Grant Holy Land
Visit their fantastic blog and read the full article (and so much more) here


COLLEGE FOOTBALL: OCT 01 Rutgers at Ohio State

Photo by Joe Robbins/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

One play or big moment per day as we count down to the start of Ohio State’s 2023 football season.

As we count down to the start of the 2023 season, we will be looking back at one play or big moment in
Ohio State history over the past decade or so that corresponds to the remaining days left until Buckeyes take the field against Indiana on Sept. 2. There are 5 days remaining.


Play of the Day: Miyan Williams’ 5 rushing TDs vs. Rutgers (2022)​


Ohio State always puts up a ton of points against an overmatched Rutgers team, but Miyan Williams did a little bit extra in this matchup, scoring five rushing touchdowns in one game against the Scarlet Knights to tie a single-game program record. Williams would finish the afternoon with 189 yards on 21 carries with the five scores, as he helped the Buckeyes cruise to a 49-10 win in Columbus. Williams became just the third Ohio State player all-time to rush for five touchdowns in one game, joining Pete Johnson in 1974 vs. North Carolina and Keith Byars in 1984 vs. Illinois.


Players to Wear the #5 (since 2010): ​

  • Dominic Clarke (2011)
  • Braxton Miller (2011-13)
  • Camren Williams (2012)
  • Jeff Heuerman (2014)
  • Raekwon McMillan (2014-16)
  • Johnny Dixon (2015)
  • Corey Smith (2016)
  • Baron Browning (2017-20)
  • Garrett Wilson (2019-21)
  • Marcus Williamson (2021)
  • Dallan Hayden (2022-present)

Continue reading...

Filter

Latest winning wagers

Back
Top