cincibuckeyenut, allow me to reply to each of your point, using some of your quotes, and explain clearly win Ginn wasn't on defense this season and will not be (at least as a starter) next year:
#1) You should be smart enough to know that high school ratings don't always equate to squat (see Ron Pawlus at Notre Dame a few years back, and to an extent Mike D'Andrea when he first got here). Many pan out exactly as expected, others don't, and others excel even higher at other positions. All-Star performances as a CB also mean squat because most of the time the QB and WRs aren't nearly in sync, so little or no completions to a given WR doesn't necessarily mean it was the result of the CB's play. If he were truly a lock-down corner "period", then he would've been playing, freshman or not.
#2) Even though it is "very rare for a freshman to play CB", if he's the lock-down corner that all you folks are claiming he is, then he's that rarity and he'd be playing. But he's not playing and didn't even get put on the defensive side of the ball in situations where a mistake by him wouldn't hurt the team (late in the Cincinnati and Indiana games).
#3) So, if "WR and PR on the other hand are somewhat easier to learn how to play" and "Ginn took till midseason to really get involved and become a factor", what makes you think he would've been more effective earlier at your-admitted more difficult position of CB?
#4) Going into the season, we had big question as to who would replace Gamble...that position was wide open, yet Ginn couldn't even crack the two deep (behind Youboty, Jacobs, and Underwood).
So, as you said, "it is very clear why Ginn did not take a snap on the defensive side of the ball". Yes, it is. It's because he wasn't even in the top four corners. Yet, he became one the biggest threats in college football on the offensive side.
#1) You should be smart enough to know that high school ratings don't always equate to squat (see Ron Pawlus at Notre Dame a few years back, and to an extent Mike D'Andrea when he first got here). Many pan out exactly as expected, others don't, and others excel even higher at other positions. All-Star performances as a CB also mean squat because most of the time the QB and WRs aren't nearly in sync, so little or no completions to a given WR doesn't necessarily mean it was the result of the CB's play. If he were truly a lock-down corner "period", then he would've been playing, freshman or not.
#2) Even though it is "very rare for a freshman to play CB", if he's the lock-down corner that all you folks are claiming he is, then he's that rarity and he'd be playing. But he's not playing and didn't even get put on the defensive side of the ball in situations where a mistake by him wouldn't hurt the team (late in the Cincinnati and Indiana games).
#3) So, if "WR and PR on the other hand are somewhat easier to learn how to play" and "Ginn took till midseason to really get involved and become a factor", what makes you think he would've been more effective earlier at your-admitted more difficult position of CB?
#4) Going into the season, we had big question as to who would replace Gamble...that position was wide open, yet Ginn couldn't even crack the two deep (behind Youboty, Jacobs, and Underwood).
So, as you said, "it is very clear why Ginn did not take a snap on the defensive side of the ball". Yes, it is. It's because he wasn't even in the top four corners. Yet, he became one the biggest threats in college football on the offensive side.
Upvote
0