One FG and we're in the lead
methinks methomps needs to spend more time in a mivivan. :tongue2:
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
One FG and we're in the lead
Ghana got screwed on a non-call right by the goal.
Having too many young and unexperienced players would also be a mistake. Look at how the African nations have fared thus far. The only team that's been successful with youth thus far is Holland, and that's mostly because nearly all of their squad plays against top-notch competition on a regular basis.US Soccer seriously need to look at getting young blood in there, build for the future. Move a whole bunch of the U-20 and U-23 forward, dig into the true youth squads - give them reps at a higher level.
Team chemistry is one thing, but having too many older players is a mistake.
No really, you think balance is what is needed? No kidding!Having too many young and unexperienced players would also be a mistake. Look at how the African nations have fared thus far. The only team that's been successful with youth thus far is Holland, and that's mostly because nearly all of their squad plays against top-notch competition on a regular basis.
Today we fielded a team with 5 players over the age of 30, one of which was Kasey Keller. I wouldn't say that we're fielding a team of senior citizens. To be honest, everyone but our veterans looked uninterested more often than not.
And the other 6 are under 30, four under 25. I'd call that balance.Balance is not really what they have though. Only 5 players over 30, gee, why does that NOT make me happy when 11 are on the pitch.
He started 23 games last year for Man City, 21 of which were in the EPL, so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.The US leans on those older players, particularly Reyna - and ask yourself this, how thin are the ranks when a player who barely makes it onto the pitch for Man City earns another cap for the US?
I don't see how that's at all relevent. We're never going to see a squad made up of teenagers and 20-year olds like Brazil was able to produce in the '60s and '70s because of the physicality and speed of today's game.As for the the Dutch being the only team to succeed with youth, you mean in this tournament, so what about a broader or historical sense? (History Pele, Brazil, youngest ever player at World Cup then, Sweden, 1962. I would say that was stunningly succesful).
You'll get no argument from me about the need for a better youth system, but there isn't "plenty" of talent for the USSF to work with. If you've watched our U-17 or U-20 team in the past couple of years, you would've seen that we're technically miles behind just about every big soccer nation in the world. Physically, all the pieces are there, as we're also faster than just about every big soccer nation in the world, but Americans just seem to lack that footballing brain that most Brazillians and Englishmen and Argentines possess. It's not really something that can be taught.Specific to this tournament, and in a broader sense, the reason you give for why the Dutch do so well in bringing along young talent is exactly what appalls me about the US system. Too freaking collegiate, too little early advancement. We need to be pitting those gifted 15 and 16 year olds against the Under-21s. We need a real minor league, not the present system. There is plenty of talent, there is insufficient talent development.