Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep, I agree, very interesting. Minnesota was a powerhouse "before the modern era" as you say - as was Notre Dame.red in colorado;1719533; said:I'm impressed with the amount of work which went into this vs just simply listing the members of the 800 wins club.
One tends to forget what a powerhouse Minnesota was before the modern era. This detailed look sheds light on what they once were.
Hats off for the time and effort to put all this together.
DallasHusker;1719668; said:It would be interesting to see how rankings would change if you cut it off at some point to look at just modern times. For instance, I'm betting that if you took the last 50 years, both the Buckeyes and the Huskers would rank even higher. Don't know if it would be easy to do that, but I'd love to see it if it is.
LordJeffBuck;1718304; said:1. Big Ten (w/Neb)........... 7,782.0 (648.5 average)
2. SEC....................... 6,382.0 (531.8 average)
3. Pac 10.(w/Colo, Utah)..... 5,542.0 (461.8 average)
4. Big XII (w/o Neb, Colo)... 4,262.0 (426.3 average)
5. ACC....................... 4,197.0 (349.8 average)
6. Big East.................. 1,769.0 (221.1 average)
I understand! :) For similarly obvious reasons, I like the time span from Bob Devaney's arrival at Nebraska (1962) to present:Jake;1719699; said:For obvious reasons, I like to compare teams from 1951 until now. 1951 was Woody Hayes' first year as coach of the Buckeyes. These are the top ten in winning percentage from 1951 through 2009:
1 Ohio State
2 Oklahoma
3 Penn State
4 Nebraska
5 Texas
6 Southern Cal
7 Michigan
8 Alabama
9 Tennessee
10 Florida
DallasHusker;1720952; said:Any way you cut it, Nebraska and tOSU are two of (maybe THE two) elites of modern college football, and the Big Ten has more of the elites by a factor of 2-1 over any other conference.
I'm thinking its likely you had to look that up, since both of those were probably before you were born, right? :tongue2:muffler dragon;1721057; said:And we own your ass to the tune of 2-0. Suck on that! :tongue2:
I'm working on it....DallasHusker;1720952; said:I'd still like to see the more complicated "prestige rankings" from this thread taken back just 50 years, to knock out teams like the Domers who are living on past glory and haven't done much in a long time.
Ah, glad to hear it! Thanks for the effort you've put into it - I found it very interesting, and will look forward to the 50 year version when you have the time. I'm really wondering if the Buckeyes and Huskers come out 1 and 2, as they do in the simple 50 year win percentages.LordJeffBuck;1721559; said:I'm working on it....
DallasHusker;1721577; said:Ah, glad to hear it! Thanks for the effort you've put into it - I found it very interesting, and will look forward to the 50 year version when you have the time. I'm really wondering if the Buckeyes and Huskers come out 1 and 2, as they do in the simple 50 year win percentages.
DallasHusker;1721473; said:I'm thinking its likely you had to look that up, since both of those were probably before you were born, right? :tongue2:
DH said:I was actually surprised when I saw the records posted vs. all of the Big Ten including dates recently - that the last time we played each other was back in 1956. I'm looking forward to quite a rivalry developing now - although I know we can never rise above #2 at the very best, in terms of tOSU rivals.