COMMENTARY
Young’s choice isn’t best for everyone, but it makes sense
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
ROB OLLER
<!--PHOTOS--><TABLE class=phototableright align=right border=0><!-- begin large ad code --><TBODY><TR><TD><TABLE align=center><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle>
</IMG> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Vince Young is turning pro. Good for him. Good for Ohio State. Bad for Texas.
Young, the junior quarterback who led the Longhorns to the national championship on Jan. 4, has every right to forgo his senior season and enter the NFL draft.
College is, after all, a steppingstone toward a career.
Spending $10,000 a year to think highfalutin’ thoughts and party like Old School is worth it only if you walk out prepared to make a go of it in the real world.
Young prepared himself for that big step by becoming the first player in NCAA history to pass for 3,000 yards (3,036) and rush for 1,000 (1,050) in one season. He capped his college career by totaling 467 yards and three touchdowns in a 41-38 Rose Bowl win over USC, a performance that likely turned him into a top-three draft pick.
Had Young opted to return to Austin, Texas, there’s no guarantee his draft potential would be any higher next year, and it easily could drop off with an injury or a down year. So I say go for it, Vince, and best of luck.
Just don’t try to sell us, as Texas coach Mack Brown has done — "A lot of Vince’s decision will be based on what’s best for everybody, because he’s really a caring person," Brown said — on this being a decision that’s in the best interest of all parties concerned. It’s not. This is about Young doing what’s best for Young, which is not to say it’s only about Young, no more than the decisions by Ohio State receiver Santonio Holmes and cornerback Ashton Youboty to turn pro are only about them.
Lost in the discussion of whether underclassmen are ready or best served to leave school early is the reality that one person’s decision affects the lives of many others.
Simply put, Young’s decision to leave Texas will leave the Longhorns in a lurch. He was 30-2 as a starter, which is a great statistic for Texas’ graduating seniors but not for returning players, who face the prospect of defending their national title without a proven quarterback. The only other scholarship QB on the roster, freshman Colt McCoy, redshirted last season and didn’t take a snap.
Brown put a positive spin on things. "We can still win football games at Texas, because we won them before Vince got here and we’ll win them afterwards," he said.
They just won’t win as many, as least not next season, which brings us to Ohio State’s good fortune. The decision that immediately hurts the Texas program helps the Buckeyes’ title hopes in 2006.
Ohio State travels to Texas on Sept. 9, and trying to upend the Longhorns, who were set to return 16 starters, was going to be a tall order until that number dropped to 15 with Young’s departure. Immediately, the Buckeyes go from being the bettingline underdogs to likely break even or better.
The night before the Rose Bowl, a reporter from Austin predicted four losses for Texas if Young turned pro.
In the afterglow of the Longhorns’ Rose Bowl victory, a crowd of Texas fans considered life with and without Young.
"Y’all don’t stand a chance if Vince comes back," one Lone Star stater said. "But y’all will whoop us if he leaves."
It can be assumed then, that come September, Texans will prepare themselves by placing pillows down their pants.
Of course, a loss to the Buckeyes next fall would hurt a lot more had Texas not ended USC’s 34-game winning streak last week. Still, not having Young means the Longhorns’ 20-game winning streak likely won’t make it to 34 — a number necessary to win a second consecutive national title.
So the decision by Young — or by any player who leaves early — affects not only him but also the collective them.
Rob Oller is a sports reporter for The Dispatch .
[email protected]