• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

ttun Shenanigans, Arguments, and Emasculated Cucks (2019 thread)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
LovelandBuckeye said:
Yes. Let these fuckers be ranked #10 and talking shit. Let them stand in the way of a perfect season and Chase Young's desire to be in the CFP. Let them have a glimmer of hope. Let alumni come back and tell stories of how they still feel those losses to those anal bead burglars. Let them...

...meet #2
Click to expand...
A pair of deuces never loses.
 
Upvote 0
cincibuck said:
"Well, Sherman, set the Wayback Machine to 1906. You may recall that Michigan was terrific that year and all the way up until 1954. Let's go live there and tell those Buckeye fans how important we are."

View attachment 23168
Click to expand...

1906 may not be the best year. That's when they got kicked out of the conference, and became decent-but-irrelevant until 1918, when they claim a highly questionable NC at the height of WWI drafts. Only 5 games were played, and obviously most schools lost their best athletes to more important things.
When normal Big schedule resumed in 1919, they had a losing record.
It wasn't until 1922 that Yost got his 2nd wind - his first under an equal playing field.
They were consistently dominant in the 20s... and id say this is where the rivalry really starts. Ohio State got first win in the series in 1919. And from then 'til 1929, went 5-6.
Michigan experienced another drought from 1933-1943, including some abysmal 1-7 seasons in there. '34 - '44 was the first time there's a 10yr period where Ohio State had winning record... 5-4-1.
But Michigan was, once again, bailed out by the War Department and WWII. And having the Navy V12 program, which brought in transfers - like Elroy Hirsch*.
From 43-50, Michigan was 1 or 2 in conference with 2 claimed NCs**.
In this period, we beat them just once - in 1944.
The WWII wave would last only so long, from '51 to '63 they won nothing and frequently finished in bottom half of the conference. AP continued giving them pity rankings for awhile but even that tapered off.
The good times start here. We go 6-4 from 51-60, and 7-3 from 61-70.
By start of '64 they hadn't seen a top25 in 8 years. Their best finish was tied for 5th in conference.
So they have a good year in '64. Win the conference, ranked 4th by AP... and go right back to being shit until they hire Bo in '69.
That catches us up to 10yr war and more recent history everyone knows well.



*Originally a Wisconsin RB. Inducted Pro HoF. Later Wisconsin AD who voted for Ohio State to go to Rose in '73.
**AP awarded ND in '47.
 
Upvote 0
NFBuck said:
Man, that's rough.



Best wishes for his future.

Ball busting aside, good on harbrau honoring his scholarship and keeping the possibility of his involvement with the program in some capacity open.
Click to expand...


Fuck that noise. I am fully prepared to acknowledge when the mouth-breathers up north do something right, but this was literally the only possible outcome. The alternative was to sabotage any possibility of future recruiting (every other coach in the country would use this as negative recruiting) for no actual benefit (the scholarship isn't going to count against the 85 cap and the cost practically nil to the program/university).

This is the equivalent of complimenting Harbaugh as a nice dresser because he doesn't put his khakis on backwards or inside-out.
 
Upvote 0
Ryan36_1 said:
Fuck that noise. I am fully prepared to acknowledge when the mouth-breathers up north do something right, but this was literally the only possible outcome. The alternative was to sabotage any possibility of future recruiting (every other coach in the country would use this as negative recruiting) for no actual benefit (the scholarship isn't going to count against the 85 cap and the cost practically nil to the program/university).

This is the equivalent of complimenting Harbaugh as a nice dresser because he doesn't put his khakis on backwards or inside-out.
Click to expand...

Yep. 10B endowment. Even at their grossly inflated out of state tuition, they can fund this kid with the couch cushion change in their President's office. Small price to pay in exchange for a ton of positive pr and no negative hit on the recruiting trail. Easy decision for anyone smarter than Simple Jim to make.
 
Upvote 0
Some of those dumb fucks think Ohio State hasn't played a team as good as them. Cause stomping a mudhole in a clearly flawed ND and apparently Wisconsin losing two in a row means that game doesn't count or some stupid shit
 
Upvote 0
dragurd said:
Some of those dumb fucks think Ohio State hasn't played a team as good as them. Cause stomping a mudhole in a clearly flawed ND and apparently Wisconsin losing two in a row means that game doesn't count or some stupid shit
Click to expand...
I'm actually enjoying this beautiful cycle of Harbaugh getting his teeth kicked in to start the season by anything resembling a good team, SCUM faithful lose their collective minds, SCUM goes on a mini run of beating cupcakes, SCUM fans puffing out their chest, SCUM gets beaten down back to Earth by the Buckeyes. Looks like it's setting up beautifully once again. Can only hope Day eclipses 42-13 in the Big House.
 
Upvote 0
Systems_id said:
I'm actually enjoying this beautiful cycle of Harbaugh getting his teeth kicked in to start the season by anything resembling a good team, SCUM faithful lose their collective minds, SCUM goes on a mini run of beating cupcakes, SCUM fans puffing out their chest, SCUM gets beaten down back to Earth by the Buckeyes. Looks like it's setting up beautifully once again. Can only hope Day eclipses 42-13 in the Big House.
Click to expand...

If Day can, Day will. I get the feeling that he doesn't give two shits about perceptions about running up the score and will hang 60 on them if he can.
 
Upvote 0
Some more context to the tsun offense that "just kept on rolling" against UMD*

*UMD defensive ranks;
  • 108th in total defense. 457.8 yards allowed per game.
  • 97th in opponents yards per play (6.1)

31 points
331 total yards
5.3 yards per play

By drives
1. 62 yard KO return TD
2. start on MD 41, 11 plays TD
3. UM 9, 3 plays 3 yards PUNT
4. UM 20, 3 plays 5 yards, PUNT
5. UM 18, 7 plays 82 yards, TD (51 yards of it on one pass play)
6. MD 48, 2 plays 29 yards, MISSED FG
HALF
7. UM 22, 6 plays 13 yards, PUNT
8. UM 40, 12 plays 60 yards, TD (bailed out of an incompletion on 3rd an 10 by PI)
9. UM 38, 5 plays 62 yards, TD (39 yards on one run)
10. UM 29, 3 plays, 9 yards, PUNT
11. MD 43, 10 plays 23 yards, FG
12. UM 9, 3 plays, 3 yards, PUNT


So when everything goes right for the Speed in Space offense (weak opponent/short field/no turnovers/a few explosive plays) they are just average.

Let's see how that works for them against a defense ranked somewhat higher than 108th
 
Upvote 0
Even more context from mgoblows offense snowflakes thread:
https://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/maryland-snowflakes-offense-2?sort_by=thread&items_per_page=50&page=5
Richard75

November 2nd, 2019 at 8:41 PM ^

For context, here’s the total yardage and yards per play for FBS offenses against Maryland this season:

Penn State: 619, 7.64

Indiana: 520, 7.12

Purdue: 547, 7.01

Minnesota: 498, 6.55

Syracuse: 400, 5.71

Temple: 427, 5.62

Michigan: 331, 5.25

Rutgers: 314, 4.36
Click to expand...

So better than rutgers. Congrats?

The whole thread is a hoot. Half slappies saying a 31 pt win is all thay matters and half depressed knowing the soul cleaning coming after thanksgiving.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top