I'll give Harbrau a pass on his first recruiting class (2015, when he signed only 14 players and finished 37th) because he came in a couple of months before signing day (and for the sake of this argument I'll ignore the fact that Urban Meyer finished 5th in his partial recruiting season in 2012).Given the way recruiting has gone and continues to go, no reason to expect that to change. Even their highly rated 2016-17 classes were built mainly on quantity over quality. The difference in average star-rating is significant. And the way the bungled their 2018 class is going to have a significant impact down the road.
Let's compare the past three recruiting classes using the 247 Composite:
OHIO STATE
Classes | 5-stars | 4-stars | 3-stars | AvgStar | AvgRank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 3 | 20 | 3 | 4.00 | 94.29 |
2017 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 4.33 | 94.59 |
2016 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 3.76 | 91.56 |
Total | 9 | 51 | 12 | 3.96 | 93.43 |
MICHIGAN
Classes | 5-stars | 4-stars | 3-stars | AvgStar | AvgRank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 0 | 7 | 12 | 3.37 | 88.75 |
2017 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 3.79 | 91.20 |
2016 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 3.54 | 89.86 |
Total | 3 | 39 | 34 | 3.59 | 90.09 |
Even though Urban holds a clear edge in 5-stars (9 to 3) and 4-stars (51 to 39), the main difference is in 3-stars, where Harbrau has signed 34 to Urban's 12. Signing an average of a dozen 3-star players a year seems like a recipe for failure, at least if your goal is to compete with the likes of Ohio State and win a Big Ten title (much less a national championship).
Upvote
0