Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is an interesting question.So will the NBA commish adopt the NFL hard-line approach and suspend McGary for his entire rookie season?
1. NCAA claims to exist for one reason, actually exists for another. Hypocrisy as defined.So McGary's just like every other student-athlete in that respect. That doesn't explain how McGary hitting the weed and getting ushered out of college basketball early because of it makes you hate the NCAA even more. And if you check the definition of hypocrisy, you still haven't mentioned anything that fits within that definition.
They're a despicable band of bureaucrats who seemingly take pleasure in buttfucking student athletes for no better reason than, they can.
1. NCAA claims to exist for one reason, actually exists for another. Hypocrisy as defined.
2. McGary getting essentially kicked out of school for one failed drug test is reason for me to hate the NCAA, even if I hadn't before. They're a despicable band of bureaucrats who seemingly take pleasure in buttfucking student athletes for no better reason than, they can.
I've responded to every issue you've raised here. Not sure why you feel the need to defend the NCAA, but they don't deserve it IMO.
Yea I guess it's an NCAA rule, not the University's. It was an NCAA administered test, not UM. If it were UM who conducted the test (or any school really, even OSU I'm sure), it would have been a few game suspension. Kind of a stupid rule.
When the school administers the test, everyone knows it is coming, which is how almost no one tests positive for a widely used drug.
The Ncaa test is a pop test.
I am absolutely baffled that there are not more 1-year suspensions then.When the school administers the test, everyone knows it is coming, which is how almost no one tests positive for a widely used drug.
The Ncaa test is a pop test.
If that were true then why did he appeal to the NCAA and not the university?True. Nonetheless, if the article is accurate, Michigan is to blame for their harsh penalty, which is clearly not in alignment with all many other disciplinary actions taken by their Athletic Department.
Had McGary failed a Michigan test, he would've been subject to Michigan's punishment for a first-time offender: a week away from all team activities and a suspension from 10 percent of the regular season, or in this case three games. A second offense is suspension for half a season and a third calls for permanent ineligibility at the school.
During championship tournaments or bowl games, however, the NCAA takes over and now may test not just for PEDs, but all banned drugs classes, including recreational. The NCAA penalties are also harsher.
By failing a test administered by the NCAA, rather than his school, McGary was subject to the draconian Bylaw 18.4.1.5.1, which calls for a player to be "ineligible for a minimum of one calendar year." A second offense, even for just marijuana, results in permanent banishment.
Only one plate at the big house bbq.Well, just what the fuck should be the penalty for felony home invasion? :p