Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I would like to know what percentage of the guys we recruit as freshman actually end up getting degrees from Ohio State.Like college amateur sports were originally intended to be....
Time to be done with the facade of big time College sports being anything more than minor leagues for the pros.
Look at it the other way;
I'll take the Fields option 100 times out of 100
- Pass on Justin Fields
- Martell, Bladwin, Mathis are what you are going to war with in 2019
- Martell transfers anyway when Baldwin wins the job (assuming for a second that Baldwin isn't leaving for actual personal reasons)
- 2019 QB room is RS Fr Baldwin, FR Mathis and Chugunov
When did they not have that chance? The portal didn't begin player transfers. Don't mean to just single you out or argue over the 'ruin cfb' claim; simply don't understand this stance of player empowerment as they've always had the ability to transfer schools.
Just don't see that a major power shift, more of a technicality. The waiver process has had substantially more effect on the player leverage and likelihood to transfer.They've had the ability to transfer, they did not have the ability to be re-recruited. The transfer portal takes transferring to a different level.
The ability to transfer in 2005 is not equal to 2019.
Just don't see that a major power shift, more of a technicality. The waiver process has had substantially more effect on the player leverage and likelihood to transfer.
I agree, if you owned an NFL team (like the Browns) would you rather have Tom Brady and "chopped liver" or (a trio of QBs like) Brandeon Weeden, Colt McCoy, and Brian Hoyer who aren't going to win anything. It's a "no brainer" take Fields. Fields is relatively unpoven; however, he definitely has biggest "upside"/most potential.
Not what I said, at all. I feel it's not as big an advantage versus the old system as some make it out to be. It's not like players had a difficult time transferring or finding the right spot (underground recruiting) in the past. Now, it's simply more organized and 'sanctioned'. And as I did actually say, the waiver process is far more impactful and relevant to player power. I'm not trying to get into an argument with you; saw this mentioned several times, by several posters, and was wondering if I was missed something.You don't see how a system that allows a player to enter his name into a pool of available players across the country for all coaches to see, while still being enrolled at another place (with the ability to withdraw your name from said pool), and having available college level film out there provides more power to the student than a system where those things are not in place?
When did they not have that chance? The portal didn't begin player transfers. Don't mean to just single you out or argue over the 'ruin cfb' claim; simply don't understand this stance of player empowerment as they've always had the ability to transfer schools.
Not what I said, at all. I feel it's not as big an advantage versus the old system as some make it out to be. It's not like players had a difficult time transferring or finding the right spot (underground recruiting) in the past. Now, it's simply more organized and 'sanctioned'. And as I did actually say, the waiver process is far more impactful and relevant to player power. I'm not trying to get into an argument with you; saw this mentioned several times, by several posters, and was wondering if I was missed something.
You're right, that's what I said. As opposed to your earlier post insinuating something quite different. Thanks for clearing it upThat is what you said. But have at it, my man.