The refs didn't fail to punch it in on 1st and goal from inside the five either ... they did, however, give PSU the opportunity to run a 1st and goal play inside the five by extending their drive with a pass interference call in which the WR slammed into Roby who pulled him down.
Spielman's comment was that the WR"did a good job initiating that contact."
I may be mistaken, but isn't it against the rule to "initiate contact" during a pass pattern?
Either way, Ohio State had a drive extended on a perfectly legit penalty and punched it in for a touchdown.
PSU got the same exact benefit (I'll even give them that it was a perfectly legit penalty edit: it was second down so slightly different but the point remains the same because--->) and they failed to score a touchdown from inside the five yard line.
But yes,
they got hosed.
(I'm working my way through the game with an eye out for the impact that the refs are having, if you can't tell.)
Edit: Announcers mentioned that Penn State coaches weren't happy with the officials at the moment after Braxton's amazing run for no apparent reason.
Edit edit: they go back to point out a "hold" after the break which was an amazing block in which Fragel stayed engaged and never gave up on the play which wasn't a freaking hold at all. But, the broadcast went out of their freaking way to point it out and bitch about it. Un-freaking-believable.
Don't show what was one of the best 1-yard touchdown runs you will ever see after the break, point out a phantom holding call.
And THEN on the ensuing kickoff they bring up the "iffy" holding on the punt. AGAIN. Holy. Hell.
To be "fair," they mention that un-called holding has gone on "on both sides of the ball" although the number of times they have specifically pointed it out is OSU: 3 PSU: 0 at this point which isn't even counting how many times they bring up the punt play.
This is a joke.
Also, the refs didn't give up touchdowns on 4 of 5 drives in the second half (not counting the one in which Ohio State ran out the clock on).
Next day edit:
I'm going to keep adding to this post as I finish watching the game just so I don't waste space.
The announcer guesses that a penalty is a holding against Ohio State when it is in fact a facemask. Nonchalantly says "well I guess I shouldn't guess what the penalty is going to be." Yeah, you wouldn't want to show bias in the telecast.
Specifically complaining about missed holding calls by the ref against a team count- OSU: 4 PSU:0 and it's not even the fourth quarter yet.
The announcers then immediately go into talking about how Ohio State is the most penalized team and PSU is the least in the conference, the implication being that that is impacting the game because OSU has had 3 and PSU has had 6 to this point.
Spielman mentions an uncalled holding about a minute later (1:45:00 in the YouTube replay of the game).
Specific mentions of uncalled holding penalty count- OSU:5 PSU:0
Another drive extended for PSU (they failed to convert on 3rd and 5) on a questionable roughing the passer penalty on Shazier. Announcers shrug it off as usual... not even a hint of a whisper that it might have been a questionable call. Shocking, really.
Not only do the announcers shrug it off, they prattle on about how it is so important to "protect players" which I guess is as close as they are going to come to admitting that it was a bad call.
Announcers mention that the "timing of penalties against Penn State has been a big issue" which is funny because I do believe the cult is parroting that exact same line in defense of their "Big Ten holds us down with officiating" conspiracy theory.
Announcers too busy waxing poetic about what a great job O'Brien is doing to mention the obvious hold on Nathan Williams at 2:13:00 on third and long. Drive extended.
They show Meyer screaming "That was holding!" on the sidelines and the announcers still don't mention it. They are STILL talking about O'Brien.
More obvious holding on Hankins at 2:15:15. STILL talking about O'Brien and what a great job he's doing in a tough situation.
Pass interference call in the endzone. Announcers congratulate receiver on "earning" the call. Once again, I guess that is as close as they will come to maybe mentioning that a questionable call went against OSU?