zincfinger
Gert Frobe-approved
5-2 Georgia has a 16 point loss and a 17 point loss, and they're in the CFP top ten? Clear reputation bias to have Georgia ranked three spots ahead of Indiana.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
After this airing of grievances, I wish you a happy Festivus.AP poll: OSU #3
Coaches poll: OSU #3
CFP ranking: OSU #4
because reasons. Fuck the eye test, fuck the machinations, fuck the narratives, fuck the SEC, fuck the ACC, fuck ESPN, fuck the CFP. Kiss my ass, kiss his ass, happy Hannukah.
5-2 Georgia has a 16 point loss and a 17 point loss, and they're in the CFP top ten? Clear reputation bias to have Georgia ranked three spots ahead of Indiana.
Again, and I'm not sure why you keep doing this, you're ignoring some pretty pertinent facts here like Clemson skullfucking a Top 10 Miami team, Clemson having played three more games with two more wins (no I won't count Citadel), and the significant injuries they're dealing with for several weeks. I don't see what criteria you feel the committee is picking and choosing here.There is a valid reason to rank them behind Clemson. Clemson would beat us if we played today. But that's an eye test bullshit reasoning that doesn't get applied to Ohio State vs ND, who we'd beat today. Or fuck.....if they're so in love with Clemson to the point where losses don't even count, rank them ahead of ND. That's essentially what they're (and you're) saying......that loss didn't count. So rank it that way or don't But you can't pick and choose which way you're ranking each team.
Where's the inconsistency? Please point it out to me. Bama's played two teams comparable to Ohio State's best win, housed one of them by 4TDs and comfortably beat the other. They've also played twice as many games as Ohio State has. You bring up Mizzou but at least they've won a couple of games unlike Penn State. The only sticking point against them is they had a lone bad game against Ole Miss. The resumes aren't even close to being equal and I'm not sure why you keep pretending that they are.Bama - won all their games, but only scored 38 on shitty Missouri and let shitty Mississippi put up 48 in a game that was much closer than the final score says. Any doubt in their minds? Nope...and there shouldn't be. Eye test.
ND - won all their games, biggest win of the season.....but it doesn't really count, bc poor wittle Clemson didn't have some starters. Not eye test.
Clemson - lost a game. Struggled with BC. But the loss doesn't count and they have studs. Garbage schedule? Who cares. Eye test.
Ohio State - won all their games. Offense is good enough to hang with anybody, defense is bad enough to let anybody hang. Star studded classes.....but who cares? They don't win their games by 83 points.
Give me consistency, then I'll let you rank them 4th. The same criteria that keeps us at 4 should have Clemson at 1.....subjective bullshit.
I don't see what criteria you feel the committee is picking and choosing here.
I just did.Where's the inconsistency? Please point it out to me.
When has OSU lost a game when missing a starting QB
Stealing this.Alabama's defense gave up 647 yards, 379 through the air, and 48 points to Ole Miss (3-4) in a 15 point win.
Alabama gave up 544 yards, 435 of which came though the air, to Texas A&M
Alabama gave up 564 yards, 414 of which came through the air, to Georgia... starting a former walk-on at QB, mind you.
Ohio State just gave up 490 yards, 491 of which came though the air, to a top 10 Indiana.
The CFP panelists are supposed to be watching the games as should realize this. Next question.
Yea gotta laugh anytime someone seriously tries to prop up Miami. The only reason They are top 10 is because they play absolutely no one worth a shit besides Clemson. Who they predictably got destroyed by.
Their last 3 games they survived each by 5 or less against mediocre NC State and bad Virginia and Virginia Tech teams.
They are basically just the “best” of the pile of shit that comes after Clemson and ND. Which is saying about nothing
I agree. But you can say basically the same thing about the B1G. It's OSU, IU, NW and maybe Wisc and then a pile of shit.
I think the combo of Clemson, ND, and Miami stacks up quite favorably with the best 3 that the B1G has put on the field this fall. Anyone arguing SOS this year needs to take a hard look and OSU's schedule so far and what they have left. The CFP committee has a difficult job every year. This year, trying to separate these teams with the schedules being so unbalanced is a crap shoot. Don't envy their position, especially if you have a handful of 1 loss teams sitting at 3 or 4-6 and have an undefeated BYU and Cincy (who have played 10+ games each) sitting on the outside looking in.
Don't know if Auburn has the horses to knock off Bama but it sure would be fun to see.
By people you mean sEcSPiN and the CFP committee.....I don’t think anyone plays a particularly high above all tough schedule this year.
Nobody is without flaw either
Bama struggled with a bad Ole Miss team
Notre Dame survives a bad Louisville team
Clemson had to comeback against Boston College.
People seem to want to ignore that though.