Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep, I have a feeling that part of this was one of those "I'm making a statement" moves by Drake, along with a lot of paranoia/nervousness resulting in over-reaction on the part of the rest of the administration. Given the report released by Waters' attorney and the accounts from several former band members the last few days, it certainly seems more like a "statement" decision than a thought out, necessary decision.
I'll be interested to see how this shakes out.
I think the board of regents need to start looking for a replacement for the OSU president. OMG what a mess.Well, my experience with things "shaking out" over the long term for Presidents who take the "I'm making a statement" route out of the gate and keep doing it, is they don't shake out well. In the end, efforts to control the "culture" at Ohio State end up being rather counterproductive when it comes time to tally up the fundraising take. (Note to Penn State, these are the things trustees should be worrying about). Dear Dr. Drake, you're not in California anymore. Also, if you're thinking to yourself, "Being President of this University isn't a popularity contest," you've been grossly misinformed about the job description.
I think the board of regents need to start looking for a replacement for the OSU president. OMG what a mess.
Dear Dr. Drake, you're not in California anymore. Also, if you're thinking to yourself, "Being President of this University isn't a popularity contest," you've been grossly misinformed about the job description.
Also from the comments in that article comes this: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/sep/21/local/me-drake21
Will the first person to post "helicopter parent" please stand up and take a bow?
Disagree. What was going on in the band, particularly in light of Waters nonchalant attitude towards it and/or active participation in it was every bit as actionable under federal (and civil) law as what you're talking about. As to your latter paragraph, soldiers might not find any problem with a so-called "code red," but that doesn't relieve their officers of legal responsibility for its occurrence.
I'm about the least PC person you'll ever meet and personally don't find anything offensive about what went on. That being said, the university found itself in a precarious legal position because of Water's inaction and had to act decisively. That I understand and support. Here's The Dispatch article on some of the legalities.
So he investigates, turns it over, gets the kid expelled, and is still fired because he didn't empathize?
Didn't realize he worked in a call center.
This has Holbrook 2.0 written all over it...