Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nicknam4;1218834; said:Also, I'm sure Michigan's new coach won't come into The Game without any surprises, and wasn't he the one who started the spread offense? We seem to have a lot of trouble with the spread.
brutus2002 said:I think Michigan hangs for a quarter or two but we pull away. I think we win this year comfortably.
Fearless predictions: Big Ten rivalry games
July 30, 2008 9:41 AM
Posted by ESPN.com's Adam Rittenberg
(Link)
Making predictions before preseason practices kick off is like stopping at Krispy Kreme on the way to the gym. You know you shouldn't do it, but it's so tempting. Keep in mind, a ton of things could change between now and when these games are played, particularly with that team in Ann Arbor. OK, I've covered myself. Sort of. We looked at the Big Ten's top five most bitter rivalries on Hater Tuesday. Now, let's look at who will win those games.
1. Michigan at Ohio State, Nov. 22 -- Rich Rodriguez will have Michigan on track by this point, and the Wolverines could do some serious damage after Oct. 4. This game will be closer than people think, a sign of things to come in this rivalry with Rodriguez coaching Michigan. But Ohio State's defense will be too much for the Wolverines, and Beanie Wells eventually will wear down a talented Michigan defensive front. A special-teams touchdown or a touchdown off a turnover could seal it for the Buckeyes. Prediction: Ohio State 24, Michigan 17
Nicknam4;1218834; said:wasn't he the one who started the spread offense?
Jaxbuck;1218742; said:Good thing he's just a poster and not a player or coach.
Do you people still harbor doubt that Jim Tressel puts a huge emphasis on The Game and has his teams prepared? The Game is not equally important, it is a season unto itself. Tressel gets it, Cooper and Dickrod, do not.
In all the things I've read about Dickrod, I haven't come across anything that shows that he is treating The Game as "just another game." In fact, one of the first things he did after becoming the head coach was to ask the 1969 players to talk to the team. While this might be a part of the strategy of coaching transition, it still suggests that he has some foresight. Only time will tell if he is going to get the rivalry and the tradition of The Game or lead scUM through a period of meaninglessness in The Game.MililaniBuckeye;1218382; said:Sorry, my friend, but Bo Schembechler fully knew and embraced the magnitude of The Rivalry, while DickRod thinks it's "just another game". Schembechler also knew how Woody coached, having spent years on the OSU staff and being mentored by Woody. Throw in the "revenge factor" and the fact The Game was played up in the Pig House, and you can see that there isn't much similarity other than the fact The Game this year will have an established, highly successful OSU coach going against a rookie UM coach.
ant80;1219114; said:In all the things I've read about Dickrod, I haven't come across anything that shows that he is treating The Game as "just another game." In fact, one of the first things he did after becoming the head coach was to ask the 1969 players to talk to the team. While this might be a part of the strategy of coaching transition, it still suggests that he has some foresight. Only time will tell if he is going to get the rivalry and the tradition of The Game or lead scUM through a period of meaninglessness in The Game.
Now I'm not saying he is going to be the next JT. I really doubt that. However, I am questioning your guys' assertion that RR doesn't give enough emphasis to the game. While I am sure everybody emphasized The Game to Cooper, the first few losses to scUM brought with them some pressure. To save his hide, Cooper started to deemphasize the rivalry more and more. Just to save his hide, blaming it on the "team", deemphasizing his contribution to the loss. I don't necessarily see RR being at that level just yet. He just might get The Game. That is why I believe it is important to make sure that OSU doesn't lose The Game for the first few years of RR's tenure.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to throw up after defending scUM.
ant80;1219114; said:In all the things I've read about Dickrod, I haven't come across anything that shows that he is treating The Game as "just another game." In fact, one of the first things he did after becoming the head coach was to ask the 1969 players to talk to the team.
Jaxbuck;1219506; said:don't have a link but he recently popped off about The Game being just one of 3 rivalry games they have. The tone of the article was very Cooperish, very strong sense of downplaying The Game.
Jaxbuck;1219506; said:don't have a link but he recently popped off about The Game being just one of 3 rivalry games they have.