• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

The 2020 College Football Season



The hope from Ohio State is that a season can begin by the middle of next month. Ryan Day put out a statement on Thursday to call for a mid-October start to the season since the Big Ten's medical subcommittee “has done an excellent job of creating a safe pathway toward returning to play in mid-October.” He reiterated his hope to start the season by the middle of October on Saturday's College GameDay show on ESPN, noting that as important in order for the conference to be in the conversation to earn a College Football Playoff berth.

Here's what pisses me off, why didn't Warren have his subcommittee work on this this 2 months ago?

Answer: Back then he was just looking for reasons to cancel the Fall football season (and he was stupid enough to think all the other Power 5 commissioners would just blindly follow his lead); not for a path to play the season......
smiley.gif


OSU-football-28xeupe.gif
 
Upvote 0
If it's really a Oct 17th start date, that means a 10-game season would have the last games on Dec 19th...the CFP selection is the next day. So, one of three things will happen:

1. A 10-game seasons, no bye week, no CCG.
2. A nine-game season, no bye week, CCG on Dec 19th.
3. An eight-game season, one bye week, CCG on Dec 19th.

If option #3, then either put the bye week one the middle of the season for all Two four-game half season essentially) and then the CCG immediately after the last regular season game; or play the eight-game season straight through and put the bye week between the last games and the CCG.

I personally like option 3 with the bye week being the in the middle of the season.

Just curious: How many schools do you think will play, as opposed to "opting out"? I really don't think all 14 will want to play, and that's OK (but they shouldn't be sharing any TV football and/or bowl revenue for the season). The number of participating school could effect the ideal schedule.
 
Upvote 0
Precisely. The will continue to drag their feet under the guise of "investigation", "research", and "discussion", while in actuality not doing a fucking thing until, "Oops, sorry, too late to have a season now."
Nah. I disagree.

That’s not going to happen.

The momentum has shifted and the backlash has been far worse than they would have guessed.

To just purposely delay while middle and high schools are playing and 3 of the P5 are playing? No way. I hate these fuckers too but that’s just not believable to me. In fact, as much as I hate these recent delays, maybe it’s because they fucked it up so bad last time that they are just being extra careful not to do it again.

This Oct 17th smoke seems legit. I think they are just working on every contingency plan now and crafting their come back message because of how bad they have been ridiculed. All the new committees organized for the return are legit because they really can’t afford to mess it up and they legitimize the (phony) concern they will say they had all along.

But, there will be football this fall. Everyone else is playing and the B1G is a laughing stock for not playing as well.
 
Upvote 0
Just curious: How many schools do you think will play, as opposed to "opting out"? I really don't think all 14 will want to play, and that's OK (but they shouldn't be sharing any TV football and/or bowl revenue for the season). The number of participating school could effect the ideal schedule.

My guesses and some rough groupings (give me some rope here):

The Bottom Feeders: MD, Rutgers, Illinois and NW are all in the camp of "why the hell would we play football if we don't have to?"

The statement makers: Minny and tsun seem hell bent on making a statement regardless of the facts around player safety.

The shiftless nobody's: Sparty, IU and Purdue seem to be willing to go along with whatever. They'll play because they simply need the money, more than likely.

The alpha's: OSU, Iowa, PSU and Nebraska have the "we're not responsible for what might happen if you cancel the season" approach.

I can't figure out what the hell Bucky is up to. You know Alvarez wants to play but not sure what his school/state leadership is all about.
 
Upvote 0
Nah. I disagree.

That’s not going to happen.

The momentum has shifted and the backlash has been far worse than they would have guessed.

To just purposely delay while middle and high schools are playing and 3 of the P5 are playing? No way. I hate these fuckers too but that’s just not believable to me. In fact, as much as I hate these recent delays, maybe it’s because they fucked it up so bad last time that they are just being extra careful not to do it again.

This Oct 17th smoke seems legit. I think they are just working on every contingency plan now and crafting their come back message because of how bad they have been ridiculed. All the new committees organized for the return are legit because they really can’t afford to mess it up and they legitimize the (phony) concern they will say they had all along.

But, there will be football this fall. Everyone else is playing and the B1G is a laughing stock for not playing as well.
I hope you're right, but I won't believe any of this until I see the opening kickoff of our first game.
 
Upvote 0
I expect OSU, Nebraska, Iowa, PSU, Purdue, and Minny are all fully onboard the train to play. I think IU, Sparty, and TSUN will play if given the opportunity. I think Wiscy would as well, but there's been relatively little smoke out of their camp and they seem to be having an outbreak at the moment, so they're a tossup still. It sounds like the Rutgers president will have to be dragged kicking and screaming if they want money, and the other 3 bottom feeders that @Jaxbuck mentioned are fine sitting out (well, maybe not MD because they need the money as well), but I don't expect they would actively try to block it happening, either, at this point.
 
Upvote 0
I personally think that no matter when/if the season starts, OSU has enough talent top to bottom to still go undefeated in the B1G and make a CFP. Even with the possibility of more guys opting out, I think with the way the coaches have recruited, the talent gap in the B1G is just too wide. With all teams losing out on game reps, full camps, etc, id still put our backups stepping up with possible losses, over every team in the conference. And it helps massively that I also think we have the best coaching staff.

Now those same losses could be the difference between ending the season with just another B1G title and a CFP or the B1G title and an NC. Regardless of the outcome, OSU benefits.
 
Upvote 0
Just curious: How many schools do you think will play, as opposed to "opting out"? I really don't think all 14 will want to play, and that's OK (but they shouldn't be sharing any TV football and/or bowl revenue for the season). The number of participating school could effect the ideal schedule.
I've no idea what a scholie costs - I'm guessing tuition, books, food, room - we're looking at 35 to 50 K per - now, if they have to put out that kind of money anyway, i.e. honor the scholie despite the lost season, then we have to look at what it costs to stage a game - stadium, security, lights, clean up, insurance and balance that against probable revenue from tickets/parking/concessions/TV. OSU stated that they needed 60K in the stands to break even. Rutgers and Northwestern wouldn't know what to do with 60K to begin with. My guess is that even with the cost of honoring scholies it could be cost-cutting for Rutgers, Northwestern and Maryland to not have a season.

If they don't have to honor scholies - holy shit storm - those three would not only not have to cover the 80 football scholies, but also another 80 female scholies. That would be an attractive alternative.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top