Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
a) It's clearly grounding, might even be a backward pass, in which case it's a fumble.
b) If there is roughing, then there should be offsetting penalties - grounding, roughing and you run the play again.
c) This team of officials should be in the FBI's witness protection program.
d) And you thought Big Ten officiating was bad.
a) Grounding, probably. "In the grasp" (if that is a thing, anymore), definitely. Backwards, not at all. It goes forward until hitting the defender's helmet and I think it even goes forward from that point.
b) But the roughing part is the funny part. Any official in the stadium, including all the non-officials who pretend to be officials in the stands, should be able to see that that wasn't roughing the quarterback. As far as targeting, there are times when I think, "That wasn't targeting" when I see it live. But when I watch the replay, I see that it is targeting. So I reserved judgment for the replay, and it still isn't targeting.
c) I wouldn't be surprised to hear they didn't make it out of Austin.
d) I know their job is a lot tougher than mine. I couldn't/wouldn't do it. I think all conferences have officials who give them all a rough reputation.
Upvote
0