• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
@AKAK ...


The United States is about to receive its first domestically produced biometric “smart gun.”

These weapons unlock like a smartphone with the owner’s fingerprints or other biometric data.

Biometric Update reports that Colorado-based startup Biofire says it will begin shipping its fingerprint and facial recognition-equipped handguns by the end of March.

Biometric Update goes on to report:

“But the smart weapon maker will still face resistance among gun rights advocates who claim the technology is unreliable and that smart guns are a backdoor to controlling firearm ownership in the U.S.”
The outlet reports that the Biofire Smart Gun, a 9mm handgun pictured below, was designed to prevent unauthorized use by validating user identity, reducing accidental shootings by children, teen suicides, theft and criminal use.



The company’s CEO and founder Kai Kloepfer told NBC News that the complexity of the smart gun is equal to a “small satellite.” The firearm allows up to five authorized users, disabling the trigger mechanism after it leaves their hand. The biometric sensors do not work if the users’ faces or fingerprints are completely covered as it is intended for home use, according to Biofire.

The product has been tested for conditions such as different temperatures and sweaty hands. However, since the U.S. does not have a federal product safety regulation for firearms, there are no industry standards to test biometric weapons. The handgun meets consumer product safety requirements as well as individual states’ handgun safety standards, the firm says.

It’s surprising to me how even some pro-gun websites and publications are promoting smart guns as a positive development that will aid in gun safety. Yeah, but at what price?

Americans have already been blindly led into the surveillance state through their high-tech vehicles, baby monitors, smart TVs, smart meters, smart appliances, and a host of other convenience-based products. Firearms are one of the last remaining non-digital items in modern society. Let’s keep it that way.
 
Upvote 0
@AKAK ...

Hey I am all for handguns using facial recognition technology. Probably not the way they think here though. :lol:

The problem with this is, my guess is the gun sucks.
 
Upvote 0
I’ve never heard the word “stochastic” before until I saw that tweet and then I saw it a few minutes ago used in a random comment on social media from someone I know.

Talk about a word imposing its meaning into my awareness :lol:
And some dude just used it on the pirate history podcast
 
Upvote 0


After 11 years, Boston Dynamics is saying goodbye to Atlas, the humanoid robot best known for its (somewhat unsettling) dance sequences and impressive backflips. In a video posted on YouTube, the robotics company says it’s time for its hydraulic bot to “kick back and relax” in retirement.
Boston Dynamics created Atlas in 2013 as part of a contest for the Department of Defense. In its very first iteration, Atlas stood six feet, two inches tall and weighed 330 pounds. As Boston Dynamics continued to tweak Atlas’ design over the years, we’ve seen the robot hop, jump, and twirl across a mat and even toss around tool bags.
It’s not too surprising that Boston Dynamics has chosen to retire the bipedal bot, given that it doesn’t sell Atlas to commercial customers like it does with its dog-like robot Spot and warehouse worker Stretch. But hey, maybe we’ll see Atlas make an appearance in another group dance video down the road. Here’s a recap of Atlas’ history at Boston Dynamics.
 
Upvote 0
I’ve never heard the word “stochastic” before until I saw that tweet and then I saw it a few minutes ago used in a random comment on social media from someone I know.

Talk about a word imposing its meaning into my awareness :lol:
You will find the word used a lot in relation to "stochastic terrorism" in political discussions. Used to describe the comments or speech of a politician or pundit having a probability of causing another person to commit a violent act.

 
Upvote 0
You will find the word used a lot in relation to "stochastic terrorism" in political discussions. Used to describe the comments or speech of a politician or pundit having a probability of causing another person to commit a violent act.

That’s actually how the word was used when I saw on social media right after I saw it used in the context of AI :lol:
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top