Not to uh, stir up debate in this thread, but I don't get this argument. IMO if you go to 8 and make the conference titles auto bids, you're looking at a regular season where you can actually have tough OOC matchups and the conference games will mean more than ever.
You get a taste of the OOC of NCAA basketball, but you don't feel like the season only gets going midway through. Also, frankly, the only games that matter right now are the big OOC matchup, The Game, the CCG and the CFP. Nothing changes if you add another round to the CFP.
Nothing changes with going to 8 teams? I would be barfing every week listening to ESPN campaign year-round for getting 3 SEC teams in every year. It’s already difficult to hear their bias, even as they’re broadcasting games. ESPN’s agenda is to expand their influence, and an 8-team playoff would do that, don’t fall for it.
You want to expand? Fine, go to 6 teams: The Power-5 CCG winners (which actually makes it an 11-team playoff, starting with the CCGs), and the highest 1 team among the independents and the non-p5 conference champions. This gives all of the other conferences a chance. If it’s determined to ignore the independents, I’m OK with that, it forces ND to join a conference.
A team bitches about being left out? Win your division. Want to schedule a tough non-conference game? It won’t hurt your chances by losing a non-conf game. Bama doesn’t get a free pass into the playoff if they lose their CCG, like they would have this weekend. You lose your CCG, you’re out. No committee to use the ‘eye-test’ to bail you out.
It’s not just a 6-team playoff. The CCGs are elimination games, which makes each conference championship more important, as they should be. This puts all 5 CCG winners in, like your plan does, but it doesn’t leave 3 spots for a committee to fill.
Upvote
0