Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
SoCal;1486233; said:Wow. Didn't think the Berry remark would rile people up so much (well, ok, i kind of did...). But I wasn't trying to make fun of the kid or be a d*ck. I literally meant it when I question if he'll be in jail. Because if he's charged with a felony (intent to distribute, i.e. drug dealer...) he will spend some time in jail. I'm not saying that I think he intended to sell, nor do I think he should be charged so seriously, but whatever our opinions are on it doesn't matter- it's up to the judge to decide what kind of penalty he gets. I think he should and will play football, and I honestly think this country's pot laws are messed up... but I'm just pointing out the facts.
Also, I never said OSU should play exclusively out of the wildcat- just said they could show it a few times to confuse the SC defense, who will be playing with 3 new linebackers. Let's face it, last year SC players were saying they played well not simply because they outperformed OSU, but because the playcalling was predictable. Several LB's and DB's were quoted directly after the game as saying they knew exactly what was coming, and they could just pin their ears back and go. All I was getting at was that it wouldn't hurt OSU to try something different.
Finally, the Herron thing... why get so offended when I say Saines a better RB? He accelerates better and has better top end speed. That's just my opinion. When I see the two of them play, I just think Saine has more of an upside. So he should see a lot more plays. That's all. I think McKnight and Gable are SC's best backs, and I honestly don't know why they don't get the carries exclusively, but that doesn't mean I think the other guys suck.
So you guys can think I'm an idiot, whatever, I'm not a die-hard OSU fan, so I don't know the team as well as you do, just trying to have a dialogue here cuz there's nothing else to talk about in the world of college football right now. Sorry for pi**ing off so many people just by talking about the gameplan.
In NCAA video games? Maybe.SoCal;1486233; said:Finally, the Herron thing... why get so offended when I say Saines a better RB? He accelerates better and has better top end speed.
Name the game where he was more impressive.That's just my opinion. When I see the two of them play
That doesn't change how they are executing now... and it certainly doesn't make him a useful option for taking the ball out of Pryor's hand in the gun.I just think Saine has more of an upside.
If you're going to put it out there, you've got to be ready for people to come back at you about it.I'm not a die-hard OSU fan, so I don't know the team as well as you do, just trying to have a dialogue here cuz there's nothing else to talk about in the world of college football right now. Sorry for pi**ing off so many people just by talking about the gameplan.
SoCal;1486381; said:Here is my sacrificial offering unto the buckeye gods, lest i be forever banned from buckeye planet.
SoCal;1485843; said:Howdy, Buckeye fans. I've been reading this thread periodically over the past couple of months, and I'm really surprised there haven't been more posts about the actual gameplan. So here goes...
SC offense- Given that it will be Corp's second career start, in a hostile environment, against a solid D, I would expect the first quarter to be a conservative attack, with 75% run plays. Sweep left, sweep right, rinse, repeat...Then the play action (our bread and butter) for the rest of the half.
I would put D. Williams in the slot, and force OSU to defend the middle of the field against the slant pass- thereby opening up the outside to the little screens to McKnight that they really enjoy running.
Corp is a running QB, and I think they should run a lot of bootleg, and move the pocket around, to give him an opportunity to pick up yards on the ground. I think the edge we have is on the perimeter, because I don't think OSU makes the one-on-one plays against us on the line of scrimmage (w/exception of maybe Chekwa).
We need to use Havili more as a reciever out of the backfield, and we will have some tremendously talented tight ends this year. Those positions will be crucial to this game. OSU will probably play man to man, and I think it gives us an edge in the short passing game.
OSU offense- Pryor is really going to have to play lights out. His recieving corps will be outmatched by our secondary, and he can't lob the ball 40 yards downfield with Taylor Mays looking to injure some people.
I would actually periodically go with kind of a wildcat look, with Saine taking the snap, and pryor lined up on the outside. Basically, anything to confuse the inexperienced SC linebackers, and keep the blitz in check.
I would expect Tressel to spread the field, and open up running lanes for Pryor, moving him laterally in the backfield so he can dink and dunk some short passes against our zone D. The key for OSU is to keep the clock rolling, move the ball consistently, and don't let Pryor throw any picks. I don't think Herron will be any kind of factor. Sorry, Boom fans, but he's just not that fast, and I don't see how he helps against one of the fastest defenses in CF. I think Saine should be used alot, and Berry, if he's not in jail by then.
Tressel is a good defensive coach, but not a very good offensive coach. He needs to let his OC open up the playbook, and start getting creative. Using sheer talent to overwhelm the Ohio highschool teams, and Michigan, will not work when you guys play SC or PennState. Unless Tressel finally gets aggressive on offense, he's not going to win the big OOC games. The 5* talent is there, but the gameplan (witness 08' Coliseum) is pathetic.
Anyway, thats what I've got to say about that. I don't see this being a high-scoring game, and I think the team with fewest penalties wins.
I dont think the pass rush will have a drop off at all. Actually, I think it will be better than last year. Everyone seems to think that SC 's LBers will be hard to replace, but I think people will be VERY surprised at the new group. The D will be more solid than expected IMO.Buckeneye;1486021; said:Forgive me, but I'm not sold on USC's secondary yet. Lets see what happens when their pass rush drops off a bit and opposing QB's have time/make time to throw.
May's can't have fun making huge hits while usually being out of place on defense.
SoCal stopping Pryor's running ability means either they play a spy or move a Safety up a bit, and if Terrelle's reads have improved equally with his passing mechanics, then that's going to be a huge issue for the USC defense.