• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

SF William Buford - 4 BTT Title Games, most Buckeye starts (Virtus Roma - Italy)

keeganbrick;1489069; said:
I'd like to just see Turner run the point and have Lighty, Diebs, Buford and Turner all on the court at the same time.

Whatever we do we need to improve the assist-to-turnover ratio. We were outside the top six in the conference and below the top 40 in the nation. Missouri, Pitt and North Carolina were in the top four.

I'm not sure putting Evan at the point necessarily addresses that and it limits other things he can do offensively. I'd rather fill that void with a true PG and let Evan play his natural position.
 
Upvote 0
billmac91;1489086; said:
not a bad idea....biggest downside is being unable to get Evan the ball in scoring positions.

Evan is in a scoring position when he HAS the ball. He played point a great deal in our half court offensive sets last season actually. Our PGs mostly broke the half court line and then got rid of the ball ASAP and let ET run the show anyway. So the only real difference to him playing full-time PG for stretches is that he'd have to bring the ball up and if we play m-t-m he'd have to guard the other team's PG.

I don't think breaking the timeline is a problem ( he's a good enough b/h in space - it is in traffic that he gets picked regularly ). He might need help from the wings more, but that is not a big obstacle. Plus he should be playing less minutes so getting tired won't be an issue. The defense might be a problem against really quick PGs - but frankly ET is quicker and faster than Simmons or Hill ANYWAY, so he won't be any worse than they would be and his size will help him shut down those that can't get around him.

I really don't think his game will be hurt that much. I see him shooting a lot more 3's this year ( to showcase that for the NBA scouts ) and that is easier done against PGs. Showing that skill will open up his driving game as well and when he is on he can dish out assists ( he had games of 8 and 9 last year for instance ).

I don't like the idea of benching Buford and TM doesn't seem willing to bench JD so let them all play and ET can be the PG ( Lighty WILL be the PF and Dallas the C so those are not really up for debate ).

:osu:
 
Upvote 0
Jake;1489166; said:
Whatever we do we need to improve the assist-to-turnover ratio. We were outside the top six in the conference and below the top 40 in the nation. Missouri, Pitt and North Carolina were in the top four.

I'm not sure putting Evan at the point necessarily addresses that and it limits other things he can do offensively. I'd rather fill that void with a true PG and let Evan play his natural position.

We don't have a "true PG", that's the problem! If we did then the idea of ET playing it would be moot. But we do not! Simmons is a 2 who can play a little PG in a pinch but really should be our backcourt 3 point weapon off the bench and not put in at PG where he struggles just to survive it. Hill improved his shooting greatly the last 10 games ( when the opposition had begun playing 5-on-4 leaving him wide open ) but he doesn't have the handle, passing, penetrating or much else of what a true PG is/has. He is shaky with the ball and gets rid of it as soon as he can and then avoids getting it back. On defense he is all motion but rarely gets anything from it like steals or deflections. ET IS the closest thing to a PG we have on the roster! That is not "optimal", but you should play to your strengths and ours are all at wing ( Lighty, ET, Diebler, Buford ) so I say start them all and use ET as the PG. Hill can relieve him when necessary. Simmons can come in when they need an offensive spark and Offutt when they need D. Optimize the talent and play it MOST. I see little reason to start Hill just to have a small player in the lineup - who is substantially inferior to whomever you'd have to bench. Start your best and substitue when/where you have to.
:osu:
 
Upvote 0
The best argument that optimist makes for ET at the point is because that puts your best five on the court at once -- Turner, Buford, Lighty, Diebler and Lauderdale. Anything else, and you're putting talent on the bench. Who do you take off the floor to start Hill or Simmons?

I'm not a fan of the idea of four forwards and a center as a lineup, but that's what we have. At least there's size, and it does give opposing teams some half court nightmares in terms of matchups.

This team was so awful against the press that something needs to be done, otherwise everyone is going to press us all year long. I agree that it's not his natural position, obviously, but it may be better for the team in the long run for Turner to put in a majority of his minutes at PG.
 
Upvote 0
ncb_i_buford_200.jpg

William Buford, So., Ohio State: Buford had a solid freshman season (11.3 ppg), but there is a sense among the staff that he's ready to bust out of those numbers. The Buckeyes have had their share of players leave too early under Thad Matta. That's a credit to his recruiting. But Matta sometimes doesn't get enough credit for the development of talent, simply because he hasn't had a chance to coach some of the players long enough. Buford will be one of those projects. The buzz is real for Buford to be a breakthrough performer in 2010.

College basketball ShootAround: Big Ten - Men's College Basketball - ESPN
 
Upvote 0
I just hope WB doesn't improve his game too much over last season because I think he will be borderline leave early after this coming season even though he has already been predicted as the #2 draft pick in 2011 which I think is a little high.
 
Upvote 0
Top NBA Draft Prospects in the Big Ten, Part One (#1-5)
by: Jonathan Givony - President, Kyle Nelson, Joseph Treutlein - Assistant Director of Scouting
August 28, 2009

In advance of the rapidly approaching NCAA season, we'll once again be breaking down the top individual NBA prospects in college basketball, going conference by conference. Freshman have been excluded from these previews, as we'd like to wait and see what they have to offer on the NCAA circuit before we come to any long-term conclusions. First we start with Big Ten, where potential lottery pick Evan Turner is holding down the fort for Ohio State, followed by his teammate William Buford. Purdue?s JaJuan Johnson, Michigan Stae?s Kalin Lucas and Michigan?s Manny Harris round out the top five.

#1 Evan Turner, 6-7, Junior, SG/SF, Ohio State

Having profiled Turner at the conclusion of his NCAA Tournament campaign, as well as this summer at the USA Basketball tryouts, we will wait until the season kicks off to revisit his scouting report.

#2William Buford, 6-5, Sophomore, Shooting Guard, Ohio State
11.3 points, 3.7 rebounds, 1.1 assists, 1.2 turnovers, 45% FG, 36% 3P, 85% FT, 29 minutes

Jonathan Givony

Former McDonald?s All-American William Buford took a little bit of time to hit his stride in his freshman season at Ohio State, but once he did, he displayed some intriguing flashes of potential that hint at some big things that could be in store for Buckeye fans.

Buford?s physical attributes are average for an NBA shooting guard, as he has just adequate size at around 6-5, to go along with a narrow frame, and solid, although not exceptional athleticism. The biggest virtue he brings to the table is his excellent scoring instincts, which currently manifest themselves primarily in the form of his perimeter shooting ability.

38% of Buford?s field goal attempts came from beyond the arc last season, of which he knocked down a very solid 36%. Buford has a beautiful shooting stroke, complete with a pretty follow through and excellent touch. He?s extremely advanced for his age at coming off screens?something Thad Matta liked to take advantage of?and is pretty deadly if he has a moment to set his feet.

Buford is also very capable of knocking down shots off the dribble, even if he could clearly stand to improve on his ability to create separation from his defender with his pull-up jumper, as his release is a bit on the slow side. His shot-selection at times leaves a bit to be desired as well. Watching some of the extremely difficult shots Buford made last season, though, there is no mistaking how talented a scorer he is.

As a slasher, Buford is not all that effective, as he possesses poor ball-handling skills and just an average first step. He rarely gets all the way to the basket (he shot just 53 free throws in 33 games last season, playing heavy minutes), and when he does, he seems to avoid contact, leaving you to wonder whether he may lack a bit of toughness. When he puts the ball on the floor, Buford will either pull-up off the dribble from 17-feet, or shoot a very pretty floater (a very nice weapon) in the lane. In the rare instance that Buford does get to the free throw line, he knocks his shots down at an extremely impressive rate?85%--good for second best amongst all freshman draft prospects last season.

Defensively, Buford puts a decent effort in, but doesn?t appear to have the best natural tools or fundamentals to get the job done. He does a decent job using his length to contest shots, but will get taken off the dribble a fair amount. Although Ohio State?s propensity to play zone almost exclusively makes it difficult to get a great read on Buford?s potential on this end of the floor, it seems safe to say that he has plenty of room to improve here.

At this juncture, Buford is a fairly one-dimensional shooter/scorer, which isn?t a huge shock considering the stage of development he?s currently at. He would be well served to continue to work on his all-around game, be it his ability to create shots for himself and others, his pick and roll game, his passing, and his defense. Although he came into Ohio State with a big-time pedigree, Buford is the type of player who could really benefit from sticking around college for a few seasons to become a more complete player. Right now he projects mostly as a backup, but he?s so young that it?s not out of the question at all to see him improve dramatically over the next few years.

DraftExpress: Top NBA Draft Prospects in the Big Ten, Part One (#1-5)
 
Upvote 0
Article published October 16, 2009
OSU's Buford brings veteran experience into second season with Buckeyes
By MATT MARKEY
BLADE SPORTS WRITER

bilde

William Buford was expecting to be a supplemental player last season, but injuries forced him into taking a more active role.
( ASSOCIATED PRESS )


COLUMBUS - William Buford is not sure he even knows that guy who walked into Value City Arena a year ago, filled with an internal tug-of-war pitting energy and exuberance against anxiety and nervousness.

That college freshman, who had been the best player on the floor in nearly every one of the hundreds of basketball games he played in since middle school, was suddenly just one of a dozen such stars, with a lesser glow than most. At Ohio State, he expected to slip into a supplemental role for the first time in his life, and be watching and learning a lot more than playing.

But an injury to junior David Lighty early in the season thrust Buford, a three-time City League player of the year who was Ohio's Mr. Basketball as a senior at Libbey, into a prominent place in the lineup.

"All of a sudden, when Dave went down, we threw William Buford into a role and said 'we need you to be good right away,'" Ohio State coach Thad Matta said yesterday at Ohio State's media day.

"I think it really opened his eyes. William improved his shot selection, he got better at taking care of the basketball, and he worked hard at everything we asked him to do. He handled it all pretty well."

toledoblade.com --
 
Upvote 0
Who's NEXT in college basketball?

Friday, October 16, 2009

William Buford, 6-5, G, So., Ohio State: If you saw the team name Ohio State you'd probably assume the next name would be Evan Turner. Turner will be the Buckeyes' go-to player this season. But our committee saw something different in Buford. His selection was based on his potential as a shooter that will make the Buckeyes players in the chase for a top-three finish in the Big Ten. He's someone to watch as the season unfolds, especially early as the Buckeyes have to deal with the absence of Dallas Lauderdale up front (broken hand). The focus will be even more on the backcourt and Buford's talent for hunting his shot.

Who's NEXT in college basketball? - ESPN
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top