Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nick Saban would never tell him that. oooops. My bad. I thought you said Satan.If god tells him it's ok, who are we to judge?
Sources: SEC football coaches irked by added opponents
A conference call with SEC football coaches on Thursday became heated when the issue came up of how each team's two additional opponents were decided for this season, multiple sources confirmed to ESPN.
The SEC pivoted to a 10-game, conference-only schedule in July. The additional two cross-divisional opponents were announced last week without a thorough explanation from the league for how they were selected. Half of the league coaches expressed, either on the call or to ESPN privately, their frustration and/or anger over how the two additional games were chosen, with multiple coaches telling ESPN that the SEC was leaving itself open to the criticism of the whole process appearing "corrupt."
The conference call with coaches and SEC officials turned contentious after one coach asked for specifics on how the league selected the opponents, sources told ESPN. Unsatisfied with the response, sources said as many as four other coaches chimed in with their own concerns.
At one point, a coach claimed, "Favoritism was played." Another coach asked if the league would be willing to release the formula to the press, "because we're getting pounded with all these questions from the press about it and don't have any answers, and we were told, 'No, because there was no formula.'
"That's why so many coaches are pissed."
Said another coach: "There just wasn't a lot of clarity and transparency on how they arrived where they did on the two extra games, and that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. ... The call got pretty wild. It would have been a good piece of reality TV."
Several coaches told ESPN that they were led to believe, at least initially, that they would simply play the rotating cross-divisional foes on their 2021 and 2022 schedules, but that the league decided against that option because some teams would potentially be playing against each other in back-to-back seasons.
"They told us they were trying to balance the totality of the schedule, but what was already on our schedules shouldn't have mattered. That was a given. That's got nothing to do with anything," a coach told ESPN. "Again, they weren't giving us a lot of answers, so this is what they get."
Yahoo Sports was the first to report Friday that the meeting turned contentious.
Defending national champion LSU, which faces Florida as its annual cross-divisional foe, added a home game against Missouri and a road game at Vanderbilt. Meanwhile, Alabama, which was already scheduled to play Georgia, picked up a home game against Kentucky and a road game at Missouri. Georgia, which already was playing Alabama and Auburn from the SEC West, will play Mississippi State at home and Arkansas on the road.
Entire article: https://www.espn.com/college-footba...es-sec-football-coaches-irked-added-opponents
Corrupt process, favoritism played, no formula, first year coaches hit the hardest, contentious meeting, irregularities, bottom feeder school's coaches pissed.....
SEC...SEC...SEC...SEC...SEC!!!
It just means more.shit, i knew that as soon as i saw the schedule.
it was quite obvious that the top teri was given the pastries at the bottom to feed upon.
Those charges were dismissed.Wonder how it works with all their existing court ordered tracking systems?
You big stupid dummy. Not playing defense only matters if you're playing Wisconsin in the first half of the B1G CG. If you don't demolish them every second of that game, you drop in the polls.At the start of the season Alabama, Florida and LSU were all rated in the top 7 nationally.
Yesterday they allowed 647, 543 and 586 yards respectively.