Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh8ch;1340832; said:So they expect RR to start 0-3 vs JT and they can live with that?
OCBucksFan;1340804; said:So, I was just reading the game thread from mgoblog, apparently the refs cost them the game. A quote of "Big ten officials are in dire need of improvement" made me laugh, I guess with the game being so close at a 35 point difference, I can understand how the refs jobbed them.
[censored] Michigan.
Pryor was not the difference. Anyone who saw the game knows that Michigan beat itself with bad QB play, out of position safetys who cant tackle, and a couple key turnovers.....
Now that is not sour grapes, it is how it is...and how it was all year. OSU is a good team, and Tressel is a good coach... but you are kidding yourself if you think your team is "all that". They are not, and will be exposed again in a big bowl game, if they play any team with any resemblance of a skilled offense.
Look for Michigan to improve in the key areas above next year...will it be enough to beat OSU at home? Maybe...maybe not...but the gap between the programs comes down to 2 key positions, and the 42-7 score is a bit of fools gold...but buy it if you want.
most of them wanted that thug Malcolm Jenkins to be flagged early on. nevermind that it was probably dick rod who told them to go out and get into it before the game, and probably told them to start the after the whistle shit early on. too bad they couldn't buy any cheap 15 yarders to start the game.So, I was just reading the game thread from mgoblog, apparently the refs cost them the game. A quote of "Big ten officials are in dire need of improvement" made me laugh, I guess with the game being so close at a 35 point difference, I can understand how the refs jobbed them.
Fuck Michigan.
Well look for it to happen...sandgk;1340864; said:If RR starts 0-3 vs. JT that will be it for the RR career in Ann Arbor.
xcrunner;1340882; said:And 2010.. They should be pretty good, but thinking ahead that far gets me salivating. And it's at the 'shoe.
Oh yeah. I don't know if my whole salivating comment was clear- its 1 AM- but I meant salivating at just how good we could be. Ben B. should be pretty good by then, our D should be lights out on the line, LB's, and secondary, our O-line should be impressive- especially if we have a good '10 class- ... yeah, I don't like to think about it because I start salivating :p3074326;1340885; said:In 2010 we will have the same team we'll have next year, basically, only with another year of experience together. It'll be Pryor and Posey's junior year, with a handful of other guys with three years of experience (JB, Mike Adams, Brewster especially). I think we'll be beasts in 2010.
But we still have a bowl game, and next year.
Don't take this negative at all...you add to BP. But you used to rarely post, and now you post a lot. What sparked your interest?Oh yeah. I don't know if my whole salivating comment was clear- its 1 AM- but I meant salivating at just how good we could be. Ben B. should be pretty good by then, our D should be lights out on the line, LB's, and secondary, our O-line should be impressive- especially if we have a good '10 class- ... yeah, I don't like to think about it because I start salivating :p
sandgk;1340864; said:If RR starts 0-3 vs. JT that will be it for the RR career in Ann Arbor.