• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

RB Chris "Beanie" Wells (All B1G, All-American)

SportingNews

6/26/06

Inside Dish: Tressel must decide how to use Wells

A year after giving in to the spread option offense--or at least using more of it--Ohio State coach Jim Tressel has another delicate decision to make this fall: where, when and how to use uber-recruit Chris Wells. At 230 pounds, Wells isn't a typical spread option scatback; he's an I-formation bruiser with terrific speed and vision. The issue facing Tressel: Does OSU become predictable on offense when Wells enters the game? . . .
 
Upvote 0
This article seems to be looking at the issue in a manner that is far too cut and dry. From my understanding, C Wells has a decent set of hands, and in the Spring Game looked pretty comfortable running out of 1 back sets. I don't see a reason that tOSU would need to make such a distinct choice, would it be an option (to go to two back power sets when C Wells is in) yes, but I don't think it has to be a certainty.
 
Upvote 0
Matt Hayes wrote:

Wells isn't a typical spread option scatback; he's an I-formation bruiser with terrific speed and vision. The issue facing Tressel: Does OSU become predictable on offense when Wells enters the game? . . .

Only if Wells has trouble pass blocking.
 
Upvote 0
I suspect Matt Hayes was just looking for something "different" to say, but unfortunately what he ended up with was pure nonsense. The consistent, occassional use of 4 and 5 wide receiver sets last year hardly made the OSU offense comparable to the Northwestern offense. And having a large, powerful tailback on the field hardly converts any offense, a priori, into a one-dimensional, predictable scheme.
 
Upvote 0
I suspect Matt Hayes was just looking for something "different" to say, but unfortunately what he ended up with was pure nonsense. ... And having a large, powerful tailback on the field hardly converts any offense, a priori, into a one-dimensional, predictable scheme.

Agreed--even when the tailback is not large and powerful, e.g. Reggie Bush. USC runs the I-formation and variations thereof and the "experts" seem to be mesmerized by their play-calling.
 
Upvote 0
"The Truck" is coming! <TABLE height=122 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=center width=160 bgColor=#ffffff rowSpan=2>

Get out of the way or get run over!


</TD><TD class=ModelTitle height=22>2006 Beanie Wells MT2800




</TD><TD class=ModelTitle height=22>







</TD></TR><TR><TD class=bfsmall vAlign=top bgColor=whitesmoke colSpan=2><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" bgColor=#cccccc border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=center><TD class=bfsmall align=right width="17%"></TD><TD class=bfsmall width="17%"></TD><TD class=bfsmall width="16%"></TD><TD class=bfsmall width="17%"></TD><TD class=bfsmall width="17%">





</TD><TD class=bfsmall width="16%"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Yeah so what? lets say we become predictable a couple times with Chris... Look at it this way... Let's say Chris comes in during I formation a whole lot and gets the ball and starts picking up decent yardage. Then what happens on 2nd and 3 when Troy does a great job at selling the run to chris wells and all the sudden we got Gonzo/Ginn streaking down the field for a big gain? IMO chris well's could pay huge dividends in the playaction department. It's not like we don't pass the ball out of the I-formation. Especially since Troy sell's the playaction very well...
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top