• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

QB/WR Terrelle Pryor ('10 Rose, '11 Sugar MVP)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
CHU;1932296; said:
I don't know the law, but can the police arrest you for driving with a suspended license?

Can TP get in trouble for being filmed driving? I thought you were allowed to drive to school and work.
Click to expand...

Yes, but they have to catch you first. Unless, of course, you self report. But hardly anyone does that these days.
 
Upvote 0
CHU;1932296; said:
I don't know the law, but can the police arrest you for driving with a suspended license?

Can TP get in trouble for being filmed driving? I thought you were allowed to drive to school and work.
Click to expand...

you can get certain driving privileges if you have a suspended license...if he has these and shows proof of having these privileges if he got pulled over then he can be fine...say for instance a drive to school privilege...if hes caught at say giant eagle off campus somewhere he should be arrested since it is not a school activity....some people tho do not have any privileges with a suspended license...it all depends on what the judge wants to do...and we all know how judges take kindly for the most part on athletes...im sure he has some sort of privileges...as far as getting arrested for driving on film i doubt the police would go that far
 
Upvote 0
ORD_Buckeye;1932149; said:
I can just see Dude getting all pissed off at his wife because she accidentally tossed them in the laundry. "it's gone! all gone, you stupid bitch. you washed off pryor's scent. Oh TP, I miss your musk, man."
Click to expand...

Wouldn't be surpised if a doll made out of shower hair is involved.
 
Upvote 0
Buckskin86;1530288; said:
large_Terrelle-Pryor-Buckeye-tattoo-close-up.jpg


Got an Ohio State tattoo? Show us - cleveland.com


http://www.cleveland.com/osu/index.ssf/2009/09/buckeyes_football_whether_from.html
Click to expand...

y0yoyoin;1932070; said:
yes the good ol days....:shake:
Click to expand...
This is the absolute WORST time to be talking about Terelle Pryor's tattoos
 
Upvote 0
I haven't seen the car involved in the insurance violation mentioned. If Pryor owned it and didn't insure it, that's reckless and irresponsible. If it wasn't his, it may have been insured after all (definitely if a dealer car), in which case TP could have easily had the violation cleared by 'fessing up to the owner and getting their documentation.

EDIT: Just thought I should add that I didn't think about the more obvious possibility, and was wrong to jump to conclusions here.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Deety;1932325; said:
I haven't seen the car involved in the insurance violation mentioned. If Pryor owned it and didn't insure it, that's reckless and irresponsible. If it wasn't his, it may have been insured after all (definitely if a dealer car), in which case TP could have easily had the violation cleared by 'fessing up to the owner and getting their documentation.
Click to expand...
It is state by state, but many states' courts have approved clauses in the owner's insurance policy that exclude coverage for use of the vehicle (even permissive use) by an unlicensed driver. Some clauses say "known" unlicensed driver. Some courts find as a matter of public policy that coverage will apply to the vehicle even if it is loaned to an unlicensed driver - and even if the policy has an exclusion clause.

Hard to say in Ohio. For some bizarre reason they were never covered by the Code Napoleon. :p

Edit: What Ms. Deety said is exactly right. Just clarifying
 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;1932342; said:
It is state by state, but many states' courts have approved clauses in the owner's insurance policy that exclude coverage for use of the vehicle (even permissive use) by an unlicensed driver. Some clauses say "known" unlicensed driver. Some courts find as a matter of public policy that coverage will apply to the vehicle even if it is loaned to an unlicensed driver - and even if the policy has an exclusion clause.

Hard to say in Ohio. For some bizarre reason they were never covered by the Code Napoleon. :p

Edit: What Ms. Deety said is exactly right. Just clarifying
Click to expand...
If so, that would definitely apply this week. I'm not sure he was unlicensed when the insurance violation occurred, though, or if suspensions and unlicensed are looked at the same way. That would be odd, since your average car owner can ask to see someone's license before lending a car, but not check their driving record.

I do know that most policies in most states will drop you like a brick if someone not on a personal policy has a ticket or accident. They don't want risk they can't rate.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top