By Bruce Hooley
FOX Sports Ohio
Friday, Dec. 10, 2010
As difficult as it is to tackle Ohio State quarterback Terrelle Pryor one on one in the open field, it?s even harder to shut him down whenever there?s a microphone or notepad in front of him.
Despite all the considerable efforts by Ohio State officials to restrict Pryor?s access or polish his public persona, he inevitably escapes and almost always causes a more eye-opening reaction with his words than his actions on the field.
Pryor is quite the gadfly on Twitter, taking aim at his critics via his account, @TPeezy2, as he did after the Buckeyes? 20-17 victory at Iowa on Nov. 20.
?None of you haters could fill my shoes with 10 socks on. Bums,? he tweeted.
That post was deleted, as was another in which Pryor took issue with the analysis of ESPN?s Kirk Herbstreit, whom TP called ?a fake Buckeye? for daring to question the quarterback?s chippy sideline demeanor.
This week, Pryor sent OSU?s small army of NCAA rules compliance officials scrambling when he promised to give away two tickets to the Sugar Bowl on Twitter.
He since has been told he can?t do that, for fear it might compromise his eligibility should an agent or booster win the seats.
When he failed to make first- or second-team all-Big Ten, Pryor tweeted: ?Damn. I must be the worst quarterback/player. I might quit football.?
While no doubt an irritant to Ohio State, Pryor?s Twitter missteps at least can be stricken from the record.
His ill-chosen words aren?t as easy to eradicate, and he let loose a stream of them this week to the Chicago Tribune.
Asked about how he would fare if operating an offense like Auburn?s Cameron Newton, Michigan?s Denard Robinson or Northwestern?s Dan Persa, Pryor told the Tribune:
?I?ll put it like this: You put me in any of their offenses ? any of them ? and I?d dominate. I?d dominate the nation. What those guys do, that?s what they?re supposed to do in their offense. They carry the ball 30 times a game. I carry the ball maybe five times. There are times I didn?t even run the ball. You put me in any of their offenses, where I can run the ball and have a chance to throw, I would dominate college football.?
Pryor obviously believes Ohio State?s offense is holding him back, which must drive Ohio State coach Jim Tressel crazy for an assortment of reasons.
First, Tressel abhors his players speaking candidly about what they could do if only they were given more opportunities to shine individually. Coaches in every team sport are funny that way.
Second, Tressel said earlier this year OSU?s best play was allowing Pryor to scramble and make something happen on the fly, so it?s not like the head man has handcuffed his quarterback.
Third, Pryor said when he came to Ohio State that the reason he rejected Michigan and Oregon was because he didn?t want to run the spread offense, but develop into an NFL quarterback.
What Pryor told the Tribune is a direct shot at his head coach and the Ohio State offensive staff. How could it be taken any differently, when Pryor emphasized three times that in ?any? of the offenses in question he would ?dominate" college football?
What Pryor campaigned for ? making himself the focal point ? is exactly what Ohio State has done virtually from the day he reported to campus.
Trouble is, it hasn?t worked as well as when he?s asked to do less and his teammates more.
Did Tressel not change OSU?s approach Pryor?s freshman year upon inserting him as the starter in the season?s fourth game?
Yes, he did, shelving the downfield passing game the Buckeyes featured with Todd Boeckman under center to go with shorter throws, roll-outs and plays with a run-pass option tailored to Pryor.
Did Tressel last year not put virtually the entire offense on Pryor?s abilities before he committed four turnovers in an inexplicable loss at Purdue?
Yes, he did, and when OSU reverted to a tailback-oriented offense thereafter, it became much more effective on offense.
Did Tressel this season not again try an all-TP-all-the-time approach until Ohio State lost at Wisconsin?
Getting opportunities to shine has never been Pryor?s problem. Delivering on those opportunities in big games, and taking personal responsibility when he doesn?t, has been the problem he?s so far unable to shake.
Pryor rushed 18 times for 56 yards at Wisconsin and went 14 of 28 passing for 156 yards and one interception. Those numbers almost exactly match his career average in games against ranked opponents.
The only time he?s produced a Newton-type performance on the big stage was in the Rose Bowl at the end of last season, when Pryor went 23 of 37 for 266 yards and two TDs and rushed for 72 yards on 20 carries. He was outstanding in that 26-17 victory over Oregon, which turned on a jump ball he threw up for grabs on the clinching touchdown drive that 6-foot-6 tight end Jake Ballard
plucked out of the air for a 24-yard gain.
Ballard saved Pryor?s bacon on that play, just as Dane Sanzenbacher saved him numerous times on acrobatic catches this season.
Pryor seems to forget that the teammates he berates on the sideline when he throws an interception are the same guys who spare him turnovers from time to time.
He surely forgot that earlier this season upon stating his reasons for wanting to come back for his senior year.
?I?m a Buckeye until I break all the records,? Pryor said. ?I want to leave a legacy here, maybe someday get my jersey hung up. That?s one of my goals, as well.?
Was there anything in there about winning a national championship? Anything at all that was team related?
Humility apparently is not in Pryor?s arsenal, but we knew that when Wisconsin administered a 31-18 beat down in Madison in October and Pryor said within the next week, ?They weren?t better than us. Everybody knows that if we play nine out of 10 times, we?d beat Wisconsin.?
Only if they put ball in your hands, right, Terrelle?