To add to what Mike said in reply, I think Tampa is right regarding what punishments are designed for, but ... and this was 20 plus years ago in a sociology class I took at Ohio State... studies have demonstrated that the threat of punishment does not play much of a factor in the commission of crimes. Most bad guys don't believe they're going to get caught, so it's no deterrent. Most good guys don't do the crime because ... well.. they're good guys.
Mike makes a distinction that is vital to understand, and it's not that overwhelming when you see it. The people who committed crimes surrounding the Sandusky rapes are indeed either dead (You lucky fuck, may you burn in hell) or in prison or set to go to trial. But, the institution which allowed these people to operate must be punished as well. It's no different than Ohio State being punished because Jim Tressel lied to the NCAA about his players being eligible by signing that document. It's no different than USC being punished for the acts of Pete Carroll. And, it really can't be any other way. People always default to "You're hurting the players, they had nothing to do with this" and I don't know what to tell ya. You're right, but as was discussed earlier in this thread, there is always going to be collateral damage in any punishment situation. You can't gut enforcement because of it, though. To not do so would lead to complete anarchy... Imagine cheating as rampant as the SEC. Image the NCAA looking the ot... OK.. bad example.
Mike makes a distinction that is vital to understand, and it's not that overwhelming when you see it. The people who committed crimes surrounding the Sandusky rapes are indeed either dead (You lucky fuck, may you burn in hell) or in prison or set to go to trial. But, the institution which allowed these people to operate must be punished as well. It's no different than Ohio State being punished because Jim Tressel lied to the NCAA about his players being eligible by signing that document. It's no different than USC being punished for the acts of Pete Carroll. And, it really can't be any other way. People always default to "You're hurting the players, they had nothing to do with this" and I don't know what to tell ya. You're right, but as was discussed earlier in this thread, there is always going to be collateral damage in any punishment situation. You can't gut enforcement because of it, though. To not do so would lead to complete anarchy... Imagine cheating as rampant as the SEC. Image the NCAA looking the ot... OK.. bad example.
Upvote
0