ORD_Buckeye
Wrong glass, Sir.
BuckeyeNation27;2197085; said:I asked this once and didn't remember to check to see if anybody answered it. When Penn State got their sanctions, did anybody say the culture change was needed because PSU was stressing football over academics, or just stressing football over common decency like preventing an adult from raping a child?
Every time they cry about the sanctions they sarcastically talk about how the football over academics culture....but I don't remember academics being the point of that Penn State Culture speach.
The cult keeps going back to grad rates...grad rates...grad rates. After all, that was what Dear Leader pounded into their heads for decades. Even ignoring the tricks (parks & rec degrees, branch campus transfers and--according to the Pitt board--a liberal use of classifying football players with learning disabilities so they could take one-on-one verbal tests) that JoePed used to get those 85% rates, that has nothing to do with the culture and lack of institutional control that the ncaa was addressing.
The ncaa was talking about a situation so dysfunctional that the football coach ran the university, overruled the President and AD about turning in a child rapist, made decisions on Emeritus Professorships for his assistant coaches, made the decision to exempt his department from Clery Act requirements, forced out vice-presidents with whom he disagreed. That is the culture in question, not how many PSU football players left with a degree.
Yet these fucking simpletons keep repeating 85% over and over as if that is what is in question.
Upvote
0