HINYG8;2185795; said:I mentioned in my previous post in this thread that there were two 'concepts' I see on PSU boards from some posters that I don't follow. The first was that the NCAA penalties were in response to Jerry's crimes and designed to appease the victims...coupled with then saying the NCAA failed on this front. This is a false arguement as the NCAA decision had nothing to do with Sandusky and were not constructed to ease the pain of the victims...those who support this logic don't understand why the NCAA felt compelled to act.
The second disconnect I see from some PSU fans is their ability to blame Curley, and Schultz but defend Paterno. I get separating Spanier....but in my head Paterno, Schultz and Curley all did the same thing...pass it on and wash their hands of it. If you blame one..you must blame them all as they each played the same role as best I can see. And if you defend one...they you defend them all. The fact that some are leaving Paterno out but throwing hate rants toward Curley and Schultz tells me they accept how wrong it was to take no action..but simply refuse to get their head around the apparent reality that Joe took the exact same tact as C&S.
What I find baffling is that they can't distinguish between saving Joe and saving PSU. The primary thrust of attacks on the Freeh report is that it doesn't really prove Joe knew - as though proving Joe didn't know makes all this go away. But even if Joe didn't know the AD, President, et al. are still just as guilty and sanctions still apply.
Upvote
0